This example response shows how someone discusses about: <em>features of Enlightenment thought, features of romantic thought, how the poems are different</em>. The one who answers shows how the poem are different by comparing them, explaining what they both reflect and their perspective of passion. The response can be also part of the discussion of features of Enlightenment thought as well as romantic thought because it can easily be presented by contrasting these thoughts with each other. I mean, if you want to make an argument about what something represents you can compare it with something different to emphasizes its characteristics, as it is done in the excerpt.
Answer: The speaker means that he relates to a spiritual level with the plants, feeling identified with how chopped the plants are, and how he had to "suck and sob" to grow from the struggle.
Explanation: Roethke wrote these two poems with a sense of unity towards the life of the plants. In both of them, he implies that relating to how destroyed and wounded the plants feel for being chopped, takes him to a spiritual level where he finds some growth. In the lines; "I can hear, underground, that sucking and sobbing, / In my veins, in my bones, I feel it,--" from "Cuttings (later)", the author says that he "feels" that "sucking and sobbing", meaning that he had to suffer like plants, to grow from the pain.
I am pretty sure it is, would wait for another person to answer though.
The correct answer is A. Next time could you take the picture vertically? It was kinda hard to see.
Hope this helps!!! :)
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The woods are lovely, dark and deep, But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep. Indicating that she wants to linger but she has someplace to be so she can't enjoy the quiet and isolation, and after she is done with her promise, which is probably to get home before midnight, she has to go to bed.
