1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vfiekz [6]
3 years ago
15

The Beatles introduced which of the following rock-and-roll music innovations ANSWER ASAP

History
2 answers:
Karolina [17]3 years ago
5 0
All of the above        is the anwser
                      
Helga [31]3 years ago
5 0
The answer is D. of the above
You might be interested in
Which of the following demands were included in the declaration of sentiments? women must be allowed to express their feelings.
kozerog [31]

The correct answer is B. Women must be granted equality in the workforce.

Declaration of sediment is termed as document which was signed by 100 attendees out of 300 for the convention of rights of women.

The author of declaration was Elizabeth Candy. The declaration demanded for women equality with men in employment, before the law and in education.

The declaration was important because it advocated the rights for women.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help ASAP I GIVE YOU BRAINLEST
marissa [1.9K]

Answer:

I believe it's C or D  but I would choose C

If I made you get it wrong I'M REALLY SORRY

6 0
2 years ago
What group is dissatisfied with the limited availability of resources
Scorpion4ik [409]
Almost all humans to a certain extent are dissatisfied with the limited availability of resources, but if you're speaking from an academic point of view, it would be Economists, since they study choices made from this limited availability. 
7 0
3 years ago
Why might violence be tempting to activists? Why might it be risky to their movements?
Neko [114]

Answer:

We agree with a number of Thaler’s points. First, he is right to question those on the outside who tell activists what to do or offer strategic or tactical advice. Local activists know their context best, and specific instructions from outside actors can place activists at great risk. People struggling under such conditions often say they learn the most from being in touch with other activists. But when activists approach scholars or practitioners for information or resources, it is crucial to make sure that a broad range of experience and evidence are publicly available and accessible. That was the purpose of a recent event hosted by the United States Institute of Peace that featured various scholarly and activist perspectives on how movements respond to repression.

Second, we appreciate how the article highlights the role of human agency in the struggle against authoritarianism and other forms of oppression. Civil resistance offers a way for marginalized and excluded groups to wage struggle using a wide range of direct-action tactics that can be used to disrupt injustices and challenge the status quo. It is more than simply an ideal or a normative preference. We also recognize that when activists seek out support or information, they decide for themselves whether the information is relevant to their context, or whether to discard it.

Third, we share his denunciation of repressive state violence targeting unarmed civilian dissenters. It is a regrettable reality that states often respond to those who challenge state power with violent repression, regardless of which methods of resistance they use. This state violence should never be normalized, nor should false moral equivalences or “both sides”-type narratives be tolerated. Outside actors should stand in solidarity with those fighting oppression and prioritize actions that protect fundamental human rights and mitigate violence targeting unarmed dissidents.

Yet we differ on other important points. First, critics often claim that nonviolence is part of a Western hegemonic discourse that reinforces the legitimacy of state violence while simultaneously encouraging oppressed people to carry the unfair burden of good behavior under crushing conditions. Discourses advocating nonviolent resistance are in no way hegemonic, nor are they Western in origin. Over the millennia, states and nonstate groups have justified violence on the basis of its necessity, used cultural relativism as a way to prevent critiques of violence, and persecuted, imprisoned, and executed those who have advocated nonviolent approaches, which threaten two hegemonic discourses—the state’s monopoly on power, and the normalcy and necessity of violence.

Nonviolent resistance has been a counterhegemonic force that challenges both of these dominant discourses. The technique was developed and embraced by people living under colonial regimes throughout the global south, as well as by marginalized and oppressed communities within the West. Despite their views that violence was preferable to passivity, practitioners such as Mohandas Gandhi and Badshah Khan saw mass civil resistance as the only way for them to challenge the violence of Western imperialism on pragmatic grounds. Over the course of the past century, the technique spread from the global south to the United States and Europe, where people fighting racism, sexism, poverty, war, authoritarianism, and economic inequality have seen the strategic value of fighting structural violence by building and wielding inclusive power from below using nonviolent resistance.

Activists from around the world continue to make arguments about the strategic utility of nonviolent resistance, without any nudging from Westerners or Western researchers. Protesters facing a massive crackdown in Baghdad attempted to maintain nonviolent discipline by shouting “Peaceful! Peaceful!” while under fire from security forces. Women in Lebanon have organized human chains to maintain nonviolent discipline in the ongoing movement there, which is now in a particularly delicate phase. Dissidents associated with the Sudanese Revolution insisted on maintaining a remarkable level of nonviolent discipline, despite bloody crackdowns attempting to throw the transition into disarray. And in Algeria, the ongoing movement there has remained both disruptive and restrained in its use of violence.

Our book, Why Civil Resistance Works, presents evidence that mass, broad-based participation is critical to movement success and that movements that rely primarily on nonviolent tactics tend to enjoy more diverse participation, which in turn yields a number of political advantages for the campaign. Updated analyses reinforce these earlier findings, and other research helps to unpack these dynamics at a more granular level.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following results is NOT a way that trade can benefit all parties involved? A. Trade can encourage economic growth
kifflom [539]
D. Trade can keep countries from specializing in producing certain goods.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did nationalism and sectionalism differ ?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following men was one of the first explorers to investigate the interior of Africa? A) Sir Richard Burton. B) Dr. D
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following best illustrates why the system of checks and balances, limiting the power of each branch, was put into p
    15·1 answer
  • What did Spain gain in the Adams-Onís Treaty?
    15·1 answer
  • This Georgia signer of the Declaration of Independence was captured by the British during the Revolutionary War, but served as t
    15·2 answers
  • 5 things all living things have?
    7·1 answer
  • Who was the ruler of Austria
    6·1 answer
  • Why was there a sudden sharp drop of immigration during the 1830s
    11·1 answer
  • First Amendment "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; o
    8·1 answer
  • What is most significant about this quote by Raphael Lemkin?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!