Answer:
Vasco da Gama is a Portuguese explore
Explanation:
Vasco da Gama, 1st Count of Vidigueira, was a Portuguese explorer and the first European to reach India by sea. His initial voyage to India was the first to link Europe and Asia by an ocean route, connecting the Atlantic and the Indian oceans and therefore, the West and the Orient. - Wikipedia
The word semaphore, the first was compiled as a coin, 1801. French inventor Chape, who invented the semaphore line.
During 1790-1795. At the height of the French Revolution, it was necessary to devise a quick and efficient, easily understandable way of communication. France was surrounded by enemies, as well as burdened with riots within some cities. France's advantage was the lack of cooperation that the hostile allied forces had, because of the poor lines of communication. In 1790, Chape brothers began to devise a communication system that would allow information to be transmitted as soon as possible. The first tool set on March 2, 1791 was a combination of black-and-white panels, watches, telescopes, and codebooks. The first message, transmitted in this way, was: "If you succeed, you will soon bask in glory". The message was transferred between Brulon and Prce at a distance of 16km.
The word semaphore was first rinted in English in 1816.
More than a hundred year before commercial buffalo hunters began killing the Plains buffalo for profit, Plains Indians had hunted buffalo for their main source of food, clothing and housing.
Answer:
Explanation:
PRO : (1) Current federal contribution limits have not been adjusted for inflation in more than 20 years. The maximum individual contribution -- set at $1,000 in 1974 -- is worth approximately $300 in 1996 dollars. Candidates need to raise more than 3 times what they did 22 years ago to achieve the same result.
CON : (1) Only a small percentage of citizens can afford to give $1,000 or more to a candidates. Increasing the contribution limit or abolishing it altogethermight magnify the influence that wealthy individuals and groups have over elected officials.
PRO : (2) Studies show that PACs and related organizations prefer to give money to incumbent candidates, not challengers. Raising contribution limits might help challengers raise enough money to get their campaigns off the ground.
CON : (2) Because PACs and wealthy individual contributors favor incumbents, there is no reason to believe that challengers will have an easier time raising money from those same sources if limits are lifted.
PRO : (3) Candidates would spend less time fundraising, and more time meeting citizens and tending to their official duties.
CON : (3) Campaign finance problems would not be resolved by adding more money to the current system or doing nothing at all. We are much more likely to succeed if we build on what works in our current system.
PRO : (4) Given the escalating cost of political communications, especially the cost of TV advertising, candidates need more money than ever to communicate effectively with voters.
CON : (4) People who are wealthy enough to spend lots of money on political activities that are not limited by current campaign finance laws (like soft money, independent expenditures) will continue to do so, making higher limits as easy to evade legally as current limits.
Answer:
The Supreme Court receives about 10,000 petitions a year. The Justices use the "Rule of Four” to decide if they will take the case. If four of the nine Justices feel the case has value, they will issue a writ of certiorari. ... The majority of the Supreme Court's cases today are heard on appeal from the lower courts.Yes I agree
