Alright so I had to research this briefly.
I believe the correct form is mediation-arbitration (med-arb). In med-arb, the parties first reach an agreement, then proceed to write it out formally for documentation
I believe a circular reasoning would be someone stating relevant reasoning of a topic for example for atheists do you believe in god the circular reasonings are all similar: god doesn't exist (because) there is no evidence to god (because) any evidence for god isn't evidence shaped like circular (circle of reasoning) Atheists have similar reasoning as they don't believe in god hope this helps :)
Answer:
No; Cierra identifies an important detail in the story.
Explanation:
c. because answer A is irrelevant because the piece of evidence is about how to count not about rocks. Answer B is also irrelevant because there is no proof that wind-wolf was forced to work instead of helping out. answer D has nothing to do with any of it because the evidence is about counting not that he is unhappy or wants to learn differently.
The knight is not punished because the queen asks the king to show mercy to the knight, as shown in option C.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The knight committed a very serious crime with a court maiden.
- This crime demanded that he be severely punished, however, the queen, enchanted by his beauty and wanting to teach him a lesson, asks the king to have mercy and allows the knight to have a chance to apologize for what he has done.
For this reason, the queen launches a challenge to the knight. She claims that if he finds out what women's greatest desire is, he will be spared his crime.
More information:
brainly.com/question/19159256
