Answer:
1. Political Action Committees (PACs).
2. Special interest.
3. 94.
4. 13.
Explanation:
1. Many people help campaigns by giving money to Political Action Committees (PACs). The Political Action Committees (PACs) refers to a political group that is saddled with the responsibility of sourcing campaign funds, donations or contributions from various wealthy individuals (members) so as to support its political candidates to win an election.
2. Work with special interests, groups of people who share a common interest that motivates them to take political action. An interest group can be defined as a group of people sharing common aims, ideas and concerns, which seeks to influence government or a public policy. Thus, interest groups consists of individuals who are only concerned about influencing public policy of the government on the basis of a particular common-aim and interest. Examples of interest groups are labor groups, environmental interest groups, animal rights groups, etc.
3. The lower federal courts are divided into 94 districts.
4. There are 13 separate court of appeals. An appellate court, also known as court of appeals can be defined as a court of law of the judicial system that is empowered by law (jurisdiction) and saddled with the responsibility of hearing and reviewing an appeal of a trial-court or other lower court (tribunal).
Washington gives this as the Confederation's reaction based on the past government that hasn't been responsive to the people which are slow and has a different purpose. He was citing that this is from one point of view could be better than the present has to offer.
Washington was trying to let the Confederation see the possibilities that the new type of government that is being introduced would also experience problems before it can be finally settled. He also gave a further situation where he could not see the success of this, instead of a rebellion from the changes that would come.
Horrible and martin luther king jr was one key figure for the movement.
Answer:
The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.
Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.
For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.
Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.
