1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]
3 years ago
13

What are the reasons loyalists were neutral had for not choosing a side?

History
1 answer:
vesna_86 [32]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I believe is because they were not unsatisfied with Great Britain and it's acts on the Colony.

Explanation:

When we analyze the American Revolution and look at each side, it's common to interpret their relationship based on the concept of good against evil, or good actions and bad actions. However, we forget that the war was fought by common people, with their motivations. And that's the case of Loyalists. <em><u>They were not unsatisfied with Great Britain</u></em>, maybe <em><u>because they were wealthy enough; or because they believed that Great Britain's actions were normal.  </u></em>Or because they didn't believed that the <u><em>fight against England was not only unnecessary but wrong.</em></u>

You might be interested in
Do you feel that the costs of the war 2, both in human lives and financially, was worth fighting the war?
denpristay [2]

this is an opinion, so i really don’t think what others respond should have an effect on your personal answer. however, no, i don’t think the costs of ww2 were worth the casualties and financial loss because since it grew gradually, there was a generous amount of time to negotiate beforehand. however, i’m sure a lot of people disagree with this. see what other have to say.
5 0
3 years ago
which of the following statements anput the presidents judicial power are true select all that apply
sesenic [268]

What are the choices?


7 0
3 years ago
How was gold first discovered in the transcontinental railroad?
Soloha48 [4]
I think your question means how did the discovery of gold contribute to the creation of the transcontinental railroad.  There had been some movements toward westward settlement in the 1840s, but that trend accelerated dramatically with the discovery of gold in California.  James Marshall's finding of gold at Sutter's Mill in California in 1848 led to a "gold rush" in the decade that followed, with 1849 seeing a huge influx of people to California.  (Thus we refer to the '49ers.)  The swift settlement of California added incentive to build a transcontinental railway.  The Pacific Railroad Act of 1862 established the charter for doing that.  The First Transcontinental Railroad was completed in 1869. 
6 0
3 years ago
Powers not directly stated in the constitution that have been interpreted as belonging to the national government are described
Elza [17]
I think its implied powers?

4 0
3 years ago
Please Answer Quiclky im taking a pre test and it is timed
ludmilkaskok [199]

There is one God who exists as three persons (the father, the son and the holy ghost).

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Ibigay ang apat na denotatibo​
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not true about the lower classes during the revolts of this time period?
    9·2 answers
  • Why do you think jefferson planted the letters in the hands of french agents
    15·1 answer
  • The transfer of_____
    9·1 answer
  • Which two colonies were
    10·1 answer
  • Constitutional powers of the president
    6·2 answers
  • Under the Sun King, intendants
    6·1 answer
  • 3) The Articles of Confederation did not provide for a<br> or a system of law or justice.
    5·1 answer
  • Which ONE is FALSE regarding the nature of sacred wrappings?
    14·1 answer
  • "Chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as e
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!