1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]
3 years ago
13

What are the reasons loyalists were neutral had for not choosing a side?

History
1 answer:
vesna_86 [32]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I believe is because they were not unsatisfied with Great Britain and it's acts on the Colony.

Explanation:

When we analyze the American Revolution and look at each side, it's common to interpret their relationship based on the concept of good against evil, or good actions and bad actions. However, we forget that the war was fought by common people, with their motivations. And that's the case of Loyalists. <em><u>They were not unsatisfied with Great Britain</u></em>, maybe <em><u>because they were wealthy enough; or because they believed that Great Britain's actions were normal.  </u></em>Or because they didn't believed that the <u><em>fight against England was not only unnecessary but wrong.</em></u>

You might be interested in
Vladimir Lenin's takeover of the Russian government and implementation of a communist government in Russia
Bond [772]

Revolution continued because the civil war between the Red Army and the White Army was still in progress .

Russia was still a participant in World War I, with its Eastern Front fighting on the side of the Entente against the Central Powers. As she suffered heavy losses, she needed to leave the war. The Bolshevik political program entailed the rapid exit of Russia from the war, which they did after they came to power when they signed a separate peace treaty with Germany in March 1918. Thus, with great territorial and other concessions in favor of the Central Powers, Russia exited from World War I.

That was the time when the currents had already formed that would be on the opposite side of the Bolshevik. Thus began the civil war in Russia, as the most serious form of war, where he makes his war against his own.

Explanation:

  • Lenin and the Bolsheviks in power, had the vision of only one party in power, and oppressed and suppressed every other opposition. Of course, this led to dissatisfaction and hatred of the other party.
  • Little by little, armed conflicts began, the now-declared 'red' Bolsheviks and the opposite side where all Bolshevik opponents united in a 'white' coalition found themselves.
  • For the war needed armies, and so a Red Army was formed on the Bolshevik side with Leo Trotsky as the founder, and a "white" army on the opposite side who had found allies in the Entente. Fronts have been established and a war that will last a full three years has begun.
  • The Civil War was based on the almost four years of World War I that had already exhausted the country before.
  • He was very passionate and violent, followed by scarcity in everything. From war material, to medicine, clothing and most importantly food. The famine of the Russian population ensued, which would be most affected by the most numerous strata, that of peasants and workers. The war was fought under impossible conditions, both because of constant scarcity and because of famine and epidemics.

Class: History

Level: Middle school

Keywords: Russian Revolution, civil war, Lenin

Learn more on Russian revolution on

brainly.com/question/9625628

brainly.com/question/1161655

brainly.com/question/1151651

brainly.com/question/810738

#learnwithBrainly

8 0
3 years ago
I’m what way did Theodore Roosevelt greatly influence America’s change from isolationism?
trapecia [35]

He was the leader when the United States was an industrial and agricultural success.

8 0
4 years ago
Hey can plz tell me about declamation of women in space
8090 [49]

Answer:

<em><u>Ur </u></em><em><u>answer</u></em>

<em><u>I</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>hope </u></em><em><u>its </u></em><em><u>help </u></em><em><u>to </u></em><em><u>you </u></em><em><u>✌</u></em><em><u>❤</u></em>

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The significance of Washington's Neutrality Proclamation was-
Sphinxa [80]

Answer: it led the war to france

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the three-fifths compromise resolve this conflict?
lbvjy [14]
It allowed for slaves to be counted as people halfway to please the abolitionists, but didn't allow them to be citizens to please the pro-slavery side.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • My teacher wants to know what is a polis
    8·2 answers
  • If you were writing a thesis paper about events that legitimized the United States as an international power, which of the follo
    9·2 answers
  • You can run for President of the United States without being affiliated with a political party true or false ?
    15·1 answer
  • Which progressive reform had the effect of allowing direct democracy
    15·2 answers
  • In a State that does not use plurality candidate B would win the primary in which of these situations?
    14·1 answer
  • What code of behavior developed in the Middle Ages to guide the actions of knights?
    7·1 answer
  • President Theodore Roosevelt was called a trust buster because he
    7·2 answers
  • A goal of William H Seaward was to:
    15·1 answer
  • Based on the excerpts that you read from All Quiet on the Western Front, what did Erich Maria Remarque think about the nationali
    13·1 answer
  • Can y'all say something nice I'm sad rn​
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!