Answer:
He was relevant in defending indigenous peoples in Latin America.
The defense assumes that they are free and in their freedom enjoy the natural right.
Explanation:
In the middle of the year 1502-1510 - Friar Bartolomeu de Las Casas leaves for America where he lands with twelve other friars. In this period, Spain is at the beginning of an empire of magnificence, as discussed above, the Arabs are being expelled by the Catholic kings.
Arriving in the land of the natives, the friar Las Casas is enchanted by the kind reception of the Indigenous, but little by little, Bartolomeu realizes the dark side of the Spaniards subsidized only by the greed of gold and silver or other means that could generate precious goods. In the midst of the shadows of greed, however, is a young man full of vitality and with a right intention to evangelize the natives.
The defense assumes that they are free and in their freedom enjoy natural law.
From his point of view, Las Casas would see exceptional indigenous docility as a way of showing human possibilities and qualities, moving from the wild to the civilized way, so evangelizing in the eyes of the religious would not be a process of domination but rather a means of domination. for liberation. In other words, the interplay between two cultures or between two peoples would bring the sum of vast and ennobling experiences to both sides. Therefore, the exchange of experiences would only be possible if there was a mutual adherence of respect, dialogue and otherness that would converge on justice.
<span>The
American Revolution as such was a real war that had its origins in the
mercantile and tax prohibitions, which the British demanded from their
colonies in America. The
reasons why the 13 colonies became independent was because they sought
to have political and economic independence, and was achieved through
years of war against Britain. The
revolution in India was in another sense a struggle, more as a civil
and ideological movement, than war itself, because the British Empire
had its military forces involved in the Second World War, and the great
civil resistance of the Hindus, commanding the Gandhi, it was a political and religious struggle. While
a man like Washington won by military strategies, Gandhi won by the
union of the Hindu people, and the faith that all the Indians had in
him. The
problems after obtaining freedom were due, in large part, to the many
castes and peoples with different ideas and ethnic origins in India; whereas, in America, the dominant force was of European and English origin, with ideas, religion and common goals. <span>Gandhi
was accused of dividing India with his revolution, which led to his
assassination, while Thomas Jefferson and George Washington are seen by
all Americans as heroes, as the 13 Colonies shared the same ideals and
desires.</span></span>
The practice of enslaving people is contrary to Christian principles
They were both from Poland and they both fought in US Independence War. Kościuszko was fighting more in norther part of US, he was famous for building forts. Pułaski fought more on south US, he created first American cavalry. They are still national heroes in Poland.
