The effects of European colonization on East Africa versus Central and South Africa were such that:
Southern and Central Africa:
- Slavery was done on a larger scale.
- South and Central Africans were treated harshly.
- Europeans exploited resources
East Africa:
- Trade gave them access to new food crops, textiles and metal
- Slave trade was reduced compared to other parts of Africa.
<h3>How did colonization differ in East Africa versus Central and South Africa?</h3>
Colonization in Eastern Africa was not as bad as in the Central and Southern parts as colonization brought trade which brought new crops and metal products. The slave trade was also not as much as other parts of Africa.
Central and Southern Africa on the other hand, faced a lot of slavery from the Portuguese in Angola and the Belgians in the Congo. This led to the impoverishment of Africans while their wealth was exploited heavily and in places like South Africa, this continued well into the 20th century.
Find out more on colonization in Africa at brainly.com/question/12360924.
#SPJ1
<span>the one that isan example of a lord is : C. a ruler whose subjects swore absolute loyalty and service
Most of the subjects that swore absolute loyalty to the lords during that period usually do that they see the lords as someone they're indebted to for saving their lives.
So it's very common that those subjects came from the enemy whose lives had been spared during a conquest</span>
The European African intellectuals in the 1920s described colonial rule as cruel and robbed the African people from their dignity.
The Colonization process is not much different by slavery. The colony was formed to extract as much resource as possible from the colonized country and the ruler have the right to buy that resource with a low price
B. is the right answer because the north america have in common they all lived in the small family units.
good luck
D. It seems like the most reasonable answer. And there were also trading routes established during those times.
