This implies when individuals are associated with an informal organization, what occurs in that system will probably influence them.
Sociologists allude to the networks of immediate and backhanded binds interfacing people to other people who impact them as Social Network. The humanist Duncan Watts analyzed the way that people may alter their opinions about who to vote in favor of in view of the suppositions of companions and associates.
Answer:
· Most plea agreements in misdemeanor cases are worked out at the pretrial conference with some resolved at the arraignment. In felony cases where plea bargains are permitted, the prosecution and defense can arrive at an agreement at any stage of the criminal proceedings, including during or after a trial but before a jury arrives at a verdict.
Suppose both john and bill can do two tasks in a day. if john can do each of the two tasks faster than bill, then <u>John should specialize in performing the task for which he has a </u><u>comparative advantage</u><u>. </u>
Comparative advantage refers to the capacity to provide goods and offerings at a lower possibility price, not always at a greater quantity or satisfactory. Comparative gain is a key perception that trade will still occur even though one u . s . has an absolute gain in all products.
In an economic model, retailers have a comparative advantage over others in producing a selected desirable if they can produce that excellent at a lower relative opportunity price or autarky rate, i.e. at a decrease relative marginal price previous to trade.
In economics, a comparative advantage occurs when a country can produce a very good or carrier at a lower opportunity value than another u . s .. The principle of comparative gain is attributed to political economist David Ricardo, who wrote the book standards of Political economic system and Taxation (1817).
<u />
Learn more about comparative advantage here brainly.com/question/14846093
#SPJ4
Third parties generally serve only to take votes from one of the main parties. Third parties generally serve only to take votes from one of the main parties. If the third party has a candidate promising similar things to the Rep. candidate, the Democrats are more likely to win simply because their votes are not being siphoned off. Think of it this way: if a school class were to vote on favorite colors and there were only blue and red to choose from, it would probably be mostly equal. But if the same class were to vote for blue, teal, and red, I would be willing to bet that red would win just because its votes weren't being split like the blue votes were. Teal is the third party. It won't ever win on its own, but it can be influential in that it can help the opposite party win.
