1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andrej [43]
3 years ago
15

What is a primary goal of debates?

History
2 answers:
frez [133]3 years ago
6 0

Q: Which is a primary goal of debates?

A: To present potential candidates is your best choice

E: They have two debate sessions. One inside one certain party, and the second is between the parties. This helps voters know what each candidate stands for, their beliefs on certain problems, and the way they would solve it. This allows the voters to view the potential candidates, and lend their support as well as their votes to the one they believe follows more closely with their own personal beliefs.


hope this helps

astraxan [27]3 years ago
3 0
To prove which party is best I believe
You might be interested in
Many free blacks lived in the South during the 1600s and 1700s.<br><br> True<br> False
Lunna [17]
True since most blacks at the time lived in the south
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
EE<br> E<br> E<br> E<br> E<br> E<br> E<br> EEE<br> E<br> E<br> EE
babymother [125]
The 3rd one is the correct answer
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which best describes a social democracy?
notka56 [123]

Answer:

B - a country where the government controls the economy but allows free elections and other civil liberties

Explanation:

correct on edge

6 0
2 years ago
Which explains the message of this cartoon? Forest were being consumed by money-hungry lumber companies, and Pinchotneeded suppo
qwelly [4]

Forests were being consumed by money-hungry lumber companies, and Pinchot needed support in his conservation efforts.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select all that apply. The Nuremberg Trials establishes which new principals in regards to war crimes
77julia77 [94]

Answer:

C. The excuse ‘you all did it too’ would not be a valid excuse for crimes against humanity.

D. Individuals can be held responsible for their actions, and cannot claim they were following their superior leadership orders.

Explanation:

With the Nuremberg Trials, several principles that were arranged prior to them started off. The Intentional Military Tribunal was formed, setting rules as to what, how, and who can and should be charged for war crimes against the humanity. Two of the basic principles that were established were that excuses/defenses from the type of ''you all did it too'' will not be accepted as valid, and that every individual can be charged for war crimes, despite claims of orders from their superiors.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Rulers of the Mayan city-states claimed
    12·1 answer
  • Who was virgil in ancient rome
    6·1 answer
  • Similarities and differences between the french and british revolution
    6·1 answer
  • What events in 2017 relates to the events that lead to the civil war of 1861?
    7·1 answer
  • Margo read two epics.
    7·1 answer
  • What was the first commercial photography process?
    8·2 answers
  • Which products did axum produce ? choose three correct answer ​
    6·2 answers
  • Use the map to answer the questions
    12·1 answer
  • Why was luther summoned to the diet of worms
    12·1 answer
  • What made it possible for the Great Zimbabwe population to grow?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!