whether the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a jury trial applies to the states
The issue in the case was whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee the right to jury trial in state prosecutions where sentences as long as two years may be imposed. In its ruling, the Supreme Court found that the right to a jury trial in criminal cases is within the 14th Amendment and so is applicable to the states
Delegated powers= powers held b the National Government only. Provide two examples: 1.declare war and make peace 2.coin and print money; implied powers= they are not written in the Constitution but it is inferred that the National Government has these powers. concurrent powers= they are shared by the National and State governments. Provide two examples: 1.collect taxes 2.borrow money; inherit powers= they obviously belong to the National Government because it is part of the nature of being a National Government. Amendment 10 states that powers not given to the federal government by the Constitution belong to the States and to the people. __________ and __________ means that the National Government is allowed to carry out powers not listed in the Constitution if they are for the well-being of the nation. The elastic clause allows the National Government to stretch their powers and carry out the powers referred to in question before.
I tried so hard to answer the last two blanks. I don't know if I am right. I hope I helped.
1). Your answer would be, The difference between, Monotheism believes in one God, and Polytheism believes in many Gods.
2). Your answer would be, The Jews taught about responsibilities of the individual, and community to combat injustice, by each person are responsible for their own choices; and that they have dignity that cannot be taken away.
Hope that helps!!!!!
We can say that a person is biased when their opinion or recollection of something favors one <u>person, idea, or group</u> more so than the other. It is the inability to remain impartial.
Though it cannot be denied that the statement that was given by Lum May as to the events of November 3rd, 1885 may be biased, I do not believe his account of the occurrence is overly biased. He describes the violent nature of the altercation, the burning down of Chinese homes, and the trauma that overtook the sanity of his wife.
All of these statements made by Lum May are backed by evidence such as:
- The piles of ashes where Chinese homes once stood
- A similar recollection of the events from hundreds of Chinese citizens who were present
- The unstable nature of his wife's mental health.
All of this leads us to believe that Lum May is a credible source for the events of <em>November 3rd, 1885 </em>in Tacoma.
Unlike the credible testimony of Lum May, we can infer that the letter from James Wickersham is not only extremely biased in nature, but also an overwhelmingly unreliable source of information. Many of the participants of that day were indicted for their actions, giving Mr. Wickersham much to lose were he to provide accurate information.
The evidence supporting the statements of Lum May allows us to infer that her recollection of the events is credible and not overly swayed by bias. However, the contradictory statements declared by James Wickersham and the repercussions he may face should he tell the truth, point towards his letter being an unreliable and overly biased source.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/25061293?referrer=searchResults
