Answer:
The answer is "women's rights"
Explanation:
A protest song is a tune that is related with a development for social change and thus part of the more extensive class of effective tunes (or tunes associated with recent developments). It could be society, traditional, or business in type.
Among social developments that have a related assemblage of tunes are the cancellation of movement, women's suffrage, human right movement, the common liberties development, social equality, the counter war development and 1960s nonconformity, the women's activist development, the sexual transformation, the gay rights development, basic entitlements development, vegetarianism and veganism, weapon control, and environmentalism.
protest songs are frequently situational, having been related with a social development through setting.
The way the passage shows elements of totalitarian rule is A. It shows a secret police officer forcing people to censor their communications.
<h3>What is Totalitarianism?</h3>
This refers to the system of government that has to do with the total enforcement of arbitrary laws.
Hence, we can see that from the complete text, there is a narration about the totalitarian government that shows a secret police officer forcing people to censor their communications.
Read more about totalitarianism here:
brainly.com/question/2418241
#SPJ1
Answer:
President Richard Nixon was the 37th U.S. President.
Explanation:
Richard Milhous Nixon was the President of the United States. He served from year 1969 to year 1974. The Congress started an impeachment motion against him on record of violation of his powers and comtempting the Congress.
But the white males of the United States were in favor of Nixon. They protest against the impeachment of Nixon. Nixon was focused on the detente with both the countries of China and Soviet Russia. He also signed the Treaty of Anti-ballistic missile.
Answer:
The main unintended consquence of the policy of glasnot (which means "transparency" in Russian) was that it led to criticism from the nations of the Soviet Union, towards the central leadership in Moscow.
Leaders in the Baltics, the Caucasus, Central Asia, Ukraine, and Belarus began to criticize the soviet leadership in Moscow. In these "peripheral nations", people felt that the central government was pro Russia, or that they were essentially russian colonies.
These criticisms devolved into full blown rebellions, which led to the break up of the Soviet Union by 1991.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Here we have just a statement. There is no question. However, doing some research we can say that the correct question would be this: <em>"What pieces of evidence would best support the author's conclusion?"</em>
If that is the case, then the correct answer is the following.
The evidence would be the way the Articles of Confederation created a week central government that basically, only had the power to control the post office and deal with Native American Issues. It was the states the ones that were sovereign and could collect money through taxation. So if the Central government needed money, it had to ask the states for it.
That original statement was written by Edmund S. Morgan, in "The Birth of the Republic."