1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Neporo4naja [7]
3 years ago
14

In North America, how did Native Americans participate in European colonial wars between Britain and France?

History
1 answer:
lyudmila [28]3 years ago
3 0
Diverse Native Americans battled for both the French and the British. There are a wide range of stories of threats between early American pilgrims and the Native individuals who were at that point there. In any case, these dangers did not happen with each European gathering who came. The French are an outstanding special case to this, and truth be told, delighted in superb relations with the Natives practically from the earliest starting point.
You might be interested in
How do the geography and earlier history of Mesopotamia help to explain the importance of trade to both the Assyrians and Babylo
Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

Mesopotamia's rivers (Tigris and Euphrates) are key to their civilization. Because of the rivers Sumerians (Mesopotamia's people) could trade and travel through them. Grain, oils and textiles were taken from Babylonia to foreign cities and exchanged for timber, wine, precious metals and stones. In addition, merchants from other countries travelled to Babylonia to exchange their goods.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What was the mission of the American (African) Colonization Society?
docker41 [41]

Answer:

i'm saying D

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who ran against Andrew Jackson in the election 1828
Vlada [557]
John Quincy Adams, hope this helps
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When was the first stagecoach established between missouri and california
GREYUIT [131]
The answer is 1858......Is that one of your options

7 0
3 years ago
Locke's theory on social contract was different from Hobbes' theory because Locke believed:
kipiarov [429]

The difference between the Social contract theories of both was that Hobbs believed<u> c) that the </u><u>people </u><u>could </u><u>overthrow </u><u>their</u><u> ruler </u><u>if that ruler was </u><u>abusing </u><u>their </u><u>power</u><u>. </u>

<h3>Social Contract according to Locke</h3>
  • Government owes citizens the right to protect their property.
  • If a government was not performing, they could be removed from power.

Hobbes on the other hand, believed that the government owed nothing to the citizens and so the people could not remove it even if it wasn't performing.

In conclusion, option c is correct.

Find out more on Locke's theory at brainly.com/question/14308888.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why do you think george washington 's presidency was so important in the development of the yung nation?
    6·1 answer
  • What caused the gold rush
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following were purpose of spanish missions in la florida
    14·2 answers
  • In the early 1800's what is one way the U.S. tried to assimilate the Native Americans ?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the role of a mother on a colonial American everyday life
    11·1 answer
  • The discover of in 1851 brought many new immigrants to australia
    14·1 answer
  • What is the War of 1812 also called?
    11·2 answers
  • Hellooo can someone come please help me with my Ap (topic is about “Ang pinagmulan ng mga asyano”
    14·1 answer
  • Which Amendment has been violated?
    6·1 answer
  • When did ruth bader ginsburg retire from the supreme court.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!