I chose the 1971 film adaptation by Roman Polanski. I found that the text and film versions are extremely similar.The only distinction lies in the essence of the media that covers it.In the film, the portrayal of the scene is graphical and vibrant.In reality, you see Banquo falling to the floor, dead.In reality, you see Banquo falling to the floor, dead.
In terms of impact on the viewer, Roman Polanski's rendition of this scene is not only accurate but also strong.The specifics are all consistent with the text version: the characters and the environment are the same.The film version captures the character of Banquo to perfection: a courageous and better man than Macbeth, who at the moment thinks only of his son.To ensure Fleance gets to safety, he sacrifices himself.
Dialogue a narrator historical material characters with strong feelings
D. Sarcastic
The authors best describes the passage in a sarcastic tone.
Answer:
D. Jake tore up the main character's socks.
Explanation:
Well, all of the other answers do not make sense.
B does not make sense beacause Jake probably also eats other things and nothing in the passage says he only eats socks.
C does not make sense because nothing in the passage says Jake is the main chaecters brother.
A and D were probably the answers you were confused with.
A would kinda make sense but it is quite obvious that in the passage they do not focus on the fact that Jake brought the socks to the kitchen at all.
They focus on the fact Jake broke the sock.
So D would be a reasonable explanation and is basically the only one that makes sense.
That is my answer!
Answer:
just start with your name and where your from
Explanation:
