1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ololo11 [35]
3 years ago
5

A form of fascist government; probably the most extreme form of tyranny

History
1 answer:
Damm [24]3 years ago
3 0
TRUE A Facist Form Of Government Is A Extreme Form Of Tyranny
You might be interested in
Pre-Test Active TIME REMAININ 59:54 During the Agricultural Revolution, what was the main advantage of tenant larming rather tha
scoundrel [369]

Answer:

I'm pretty sure the answer is tenant farmers could use a skill they already had rather than starting over.

5 0
3 years ago
Why jeffersonian world view (that of the yeoman farmer as the bedrock of american democracy and the american economy) disappeare
Goryan [66]
Need for industry--the War of 1812 demonstrated the US dependence on Great Britain for manufactured goods. 

Following the War of 1812 and experiences with blockades and embargoes, the US came to the realization they could not be self-sufficient and were dependent on Great Britain for manufacturing. The US government began to invest in industry and infrastructure as well as banking to launch an industrial system. Farming remained important but as a piece of the entire economic system. 
3 0
4 years ago
Who was to blame for the plight of immigrant workers
Aleks04 [339]

Immigration is a widely practice all over the world and history of humanity, it is part of human culture to move around the world.

The roots of immigration of workers vary in time and places, so it is hard to identify who was to blame for the plight of immigrant workers, to define it we must consider each case and its parties.

Most of the time the plight of immigrant workers is the result of a combination of problems related to people country of origins and the country that receives them.

In the country of origins of immigrants we can blame things such as: bad government, environmental crisis as natural disasters, conflicts as wars or financial and economic problems.  This all will motivate the immigration which can them leave workers in hard situations.

On the other side we might blame things in the country that receives the immigrant workers, as the government inaction or the inability to the country legally absorbs these workers, results of national policies for immigration and as well companies and other people who employs this immigrants taking advantage of this situation.

So due to this situation the workers will be prone to work in conditions that might be extremely harmful or danger. We can see as well people and companies that take advantage of this situation and pay low wages or don't respect work laws because this people aren't protect under this umbrella.

Because of no option many immigrant workers will submit themselves to harsh conditions of work in the country they are.


7 0
3 years ago
Some historians have suggested the Executive Office of the President has led to a more powerful presidency, replacing policymaki
Mumz [18]
<span>
1, 3 & 4.
The plan took away power belonging to the Cabinet.
The plan increased the powers of the presidency
The plan created less accountability to the Senate.</span>
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What two things were accomplished in the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty II signed by President Carter and Premier Brezhnev?
andrew11 [14]

Answer:

The Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty II aimed to:

b. Banned any new development of nuclear weapons

d. Managed to reduce the size of their nuclear arsenals

Explanation:

The Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty II or SALT II was the continuation of a previous attempt to regulate the nuclear arms threat between the US and the USSR.  This happened during a period known as the Cold War where the world was divided into 2 blocks competing for power: the Capitalist block led by the US, and the Communist block led by the USSR.

Both countries had developed large arsenals of nuclear weapons and a war between them would've had catastrophic consequences.  Talks between President Jimmy Carter and Premier Brezhnev began in November 1974.  They agreed to: limit the size of their nuclear arsenals, limit the development of new weapons, and limit the deployment of new offensive weapons.  

The treaty was signed on June 18, 1979.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did geography affect the economy of the three colonies answer?
    12·1 answer
  • What could you learn from a fish fossil found in rock?
    7·2 answers
  • What country was not one of the three that divided Poland among themselves?
    12·2 answers
  • More goods than are needed
    13·2 answers
  • Would you rather have been alive during World War II or the Vietnam War?Explain your reasoning
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is true about imperialism in China during the late 19th and early 20th centuries?
    11·1 answer
  • In what why did Robert e lee differ from Ulysses s grant?
    15·1 answer
  • A que se llamo reformas Borbonicas
    15·1 answer
  • What was the Anti-Federalist stance on people's rights and the Constitution?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the second century A.D. regarded as the "Golden Age " of the Roman Empire ?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!