Answer:
B). Response bias
D). The interviewer should reword the question.
Explanation:
Response bias is described as the type of bias in which a variety of tendencies are displayed by the respondents to answer the questions asked in the survey inaccurately or misleadingly. These false responses eventually lead to a false or deceiving conclusion. In the given survey, 'response bias' is displayed as the respondents may display a tendency to answer the question falsely as the feeling of 'patriotism' evoked by the word 'patriotic' may prevent their original opinions to come out. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer to describe the bias in this survey.
In order to prevent this bias, the interviewer must 'reword the question' and remove the word 'patriotic' as it develops the feeling of patriotism in the respondents which mars them from answering accurately and share their true opinions or thoughts in the regards of 'supporting armed forces.' This rewording will help evoke the true and authentic responses without any bias. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer to remedy the bias.
Answer:
A. Providing checking and savings accounts
Explanation:
"Bro had a stroke mid comment" LOL
Answer:
Qualified Business Income Deduction is $9,800
Tax liability = $4,564
Explanation:
Qualified business income is calculated by subtracting an individual's ordinary deduction from a qualified business or trade from the individual's ordinary income.
Net income = $61,000
Standard deduction = $12,000
Modified taxable income;
$61,000 - $12,000 = $49,000
QBI Deduction (Sec 199A) is the lesser of:
[0.2 × 49,000 < 0.2 × 61,000]
$9,800 < $12,200
Therefore Qualified Business Income Deduction is $9,800
Taxable income = $(49,000 - 9800) =$39,200
Answer:
68000
Explanation:
Colgate has options outstanding amount to 68000 in 2013. The weighted average exercise price of sock option outstanding is $47.15. Out of 68000 the 54800 option are available for issuance and rest 13000 are restricted stock which are ready for issuance under Incentive Compensation Plan.
Answer:
$70,000
Explanation:
Under a Comparative negligence theory,
When an accident occurs, the blame or fault is determined by the contributions of each party towards the accident.
In a pure comparative negligence theory, the victim or plaintiff who files a case, sue the other party and received some part of the damages and hence each party receives the amount related to their damages minus the part of their fault.
In our case, Annette fault contributes 30% to the collision and determined that her total loss was $100,000.
So, Annette will recover:
= Total loss - 30% of fault
= $100,000 - 0.3 × $100,000
= $100,000 - $30,000
= $70,000
