1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
enot [183]
2 years ago
15

Which of the following statements is true of the Soviet union in the decades after the bolshevik revolution?

History
2 answers:
Musya8 [376]2 years ago
7 0
I'd have to say the answer is D.
Blizzard [7]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

#1. D. The Soviet Union became a world superpower rivaling the United States.

#2. A. The president, who is popularly elected, appoints the prime minister

#3. D. the power to choose a second in command

You might be interested in
Padre Miguel Hidalgo, is noted for
Blizzard [7]
Being the leader of the uprising during the war for Mexican Independence
6 0
2 years ago
Annexation of Texas was controversial in the United States?
Novay_Z [31]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The annexation question became one of the most controversial issues in American politics in the late 1830s and early 1840s. The issue was not Texas but slavery.  

Hope this helped!!!

3 0
2 years ago
What changes came about as a result of the Commercial Revolution?
konstantin123 [22]

Answer:

Hey!

I can tell you some things, but if it isn't what you're looking for, I apologize for that!

Explanation:

<h2><u>Commercial Revolution</u></h2>

First, the Commercial Revolution changed Europe from a local economy to a global one. Before the revolution, most goods were produced for family use or to be sold within local towns and villages. Other than a few traveling merchants, there was really no way to peddle goods to a larger population.

However, once trade routes blossomed between European countries and their colonies, a whole new market opened up.

Realizing there was money to be made, people began producing goods to be sold outside of their small communities. In other words, the incentive for profit replaced simply producing for survival.

These new markets and their high demand for goods led to large businesses replacing individual production of goods. As money poured in from this new global trade, Europe continued to transform. The Commercial Revolution also caused a population explosion.

Simply put, as wealth flooded the continent, it allowed for larger families. In turn, these larger families created a work force to sustain and grow Europe's new global economy. Of course, as these new markets opened up, European business owners needed a way to deal with all their money! This brings us to the formation of banks and joint-stock companies.

<h2><u>Definition</u></h2>

<u>Joint-Stock Company</u>- A joint-stock company is a business organization in which shares of the company's stock can be bought and sold by shareholders. Each shareholder owns company stock in a quantity, evidenced by their shares. Shareholders are able to transfer their shares to others without any effects to the continued existence of the company.

<h2><u>Mercantilism</u></h2>

Under mercantilism, colonies were only allowed to import from or export to the European country that governed them.

For instance, if Jamestown, governed by England, wanted to import wool from the Dutch, they could not. Even if the Dutch price was substantially cheaper, Jamestown was stuck buying wool from England. Further hamstringing the Jamestown colonists, all the goods produced by the colonies went to England. England then sold the goods to other countries at a substantial markup, which the crown, not the colonists, kept! In other words, the colonies did the work, while England reaped the profit.

It's like a poor kid squeezing fresh lemons for eight hours, only to have her parents commandeer the lemonade stand! For those of us growing up in the American school system, this ill-treatment of the colonists is a familiar tale. However, we weren't told how the system of mercantilism transformed Europe.

7 0
2 years ago
Which government intervention would most likely cause problems for inhabitants of the region marked 'Indian Territory"? (A) Home
mestny [16]
The Homestead Act was a government intervention would most likely cause problems for inhabitants of the region marked 'Indian Territory"
4 0
2 years ago
Use these two words in a sentence in a way that shows their meaning and relationship
Serga [27]

The words describe a very specific relation to slavery. It is in a sentence below:

Explanation:

The productivity of the farms had drastically decreased as the south was only able to acquire slaves from domestic slave trade making them costly.

This statement delves into the specific point of time in the mid 19th century when there was the end of the Atlantic slave trade and the essential pool of slaves in the country was what was available to them.

Thus, it was seen that the slaves became subject to domestic trade and had a higher price now.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Germany took over what country after the Munich Conference from 1936-1941
    11·1 answer
  • What building method was used for the construction of the egyptian pyramids?
    5·1 answer
  • What Would A Pope Eat In The Medieval Ages???
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following played a major role in opting for slavery in the southern colonies?
    9·1 answer
  • Under the patronage of which roman emperor was christianity first allowed to be worshipped openly?
    6·2 answers
  • In China, Why are people moving to the cities in large numbers?
    10·1 answer
  • What does coil mean in the river maiden story ​
    11·1 answer
  • What can a government official do if a newspaper publishes a story criticizing the President?
    13·1 answer
  • Quien creó la bandera
    5·1 answer
  • What steps did Hitler take to achieve his goals ?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!