1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Taya2010 [7]
3 years ago
9

Explain how changes in the constitution affected: a) the king

History
1 answer:
Veronika [31]3 years ago
8 0

The answer is C the economy

You might be interested in
Whom did the United States displace or deport during the Great Depression and World War II.
Tom [10]

Answer:

By 1929 the Southwest was responsible for 40 percent of the United States' total fruit .... to the Depression and ordered the Labor Department to develop a deportation ... during World War II, some of LULAC's advisors were employed by the U.S.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What is directly to the formation of the Republican Party
Anna11 [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Republican Party emerged in 1854 to combat the Kansas–Nebraska Act and the expansion of slavery into American territories. The early Republican Party consisted of African-Americans, northern white Protestants, businessmen, professionals, factory workers, and farmers.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the role of the Vice President of the United States?
alexdok [17]
I think it is to help the president make certain decision and if he/she dies they take over

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which alliance did russia leave when it dropped out of the war?
horsena [70]

the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was a peace treaty signed on 3 March 1918 between the new Bolshevik government of Soviet Russia and the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria, and the Ottoman Empire), that ended Russia's participation in World War I. The treaty was signed at Brest-Litovsk (Polish: Brześć Litewski; since 1945 Brest), after two months of negotiations. The treaty was agreed upon by the Bolshevik government to stop further advances by German and Austro-Hungarian forces. According to the treaty, Soviet Russia defaulted on all of Imperial Russia's commitments to the Triple Entente alliance

3 0
3 years ago
How does Jean Bodin define absolute rule?
sammy [17]

The writings of Jean Bodin provides us with an early theorisation of the idea of sovereignty even though the examples he uses are quite extensive. Essential to Bodin's notion of sovereignty is that the power the sovereign holds must be absolute and permanent. If a ruler holds absolute power for the duration of his life he can be said to be sovereign. In contrast, an elected official or some other person that holds limited powers can not be described to be sovereign. Although at times Bodin suggests that the people are sovereign, his definition of sovereignty as absolute, unlimited and enduring power points purposively towards a positive association of sovereignty and a singular monarchical, or even tyrannical, power.

Another qualification that Bodin introduces into the definition of sovereignty as absolute and perpetual is one that will become increasingly important in subsequent theorisations, culminating in the work of Carl Schmitt. For Bodin, a sovereign prince is one who is exempt from obedience to the laws of his predecessors and more importantly, those issued by himself. Sovereignty rests in being above, beyond or excepted from the law. Although it occupies a subordinate place in Bodin's theorisation, it could be said that this exception from being subject to the law is the quintessential condition of sovereignty in so far as it is understood politically.

Although for Bodin sovereignty is characterised by absolute and perpetual power he goes on to make a series of important qualifications to this concept. These come from two principle concerns. The first is real politics - Bodin seems to be aware that absolute power could licence behaviour injurious to sovereign authority. Hence for example a sovereign cannot and should not confiscate property nor break contractual agreements made with other sovereigns, estates nor private persons. The second reason is Bodin's underlying theological notion of divine authority and natural law. A sovereign may put aside civil law, but he must not question natural law (in which it appears right of property is sanctioned). Saying this, it is ultimately from this divine authority that the earthly right of sovereign power is legitimated. The prince literary does god's bidding, and yet by virtue of this can do wrong. Hopefully this helps out some :)

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following accurately summarizes an idea of english enlightenment philosopher john locke
    15·2 answers
  • Please help!!! 20 pts!
    9·2 answers
  • How was Spain’s empire organized
    13·1 answer
  • 3. REASONING Did
    10·1 answer
  • After President Nixon’s resignation, who became president of the United States?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following transportation routes did the Egyptians use most for trade?
    11·1 answer
  • How did World War I assist the women's suffrage movement in the United States?
    14·2 answers
  • Identify the location of the qin dyasty​
    8·1 answer
  • What happens to trees from one life zone to the next?
    14·2 answers
  • Which statement is true about Ivan the Terrible?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!