Answer:
Expectancy violation
Explanation:
Expectancy violation theory is a theory that tries to explain the unexpected behavior of a person or human being. This theory is based on uncertainty reduction theory where a person's unusual behavior of vagueness has been reduced by interaction. It has been developed from the nonverbal expectancy model that was given by Judee k Burgoon. This theory has been describing the personal space of a person that has been possessed by a person and the response of a person towards violation. This theory focuses on the specific perception of a person in a specific situation. When people start to speak with another person then they expect that in what manner a person will respond to them.
<u>There are two types of expectancy
</u>
Answer:
<em>Responses may vary but should include some or all of the following information:</em> While it is true that heredity has a great effect on an individual's level of intelligence, research suggests that environment has the most influence of the two factors. An environment of deprivation can hinder even the most genetically gifted child, while a child with modest gifts can be helped to achieve great intellectual works in a richly stimulating environment. Environmental factors have even been shown to affect intelligence scores by as much as 25 points, which is the difference between someone of average intelligence and someone who is gifted. Genetics may set the base levels of achievement, but human perseverance can affect a huge change in observed intelligence.
Explanation:
Many public interest groups rely on the courts instead of the legislative or executive branches because they frequently lack the resources to engage in electioneering and lobbying against other interest groups.
They typically challenge federal court judgments and seek state remedies. They frequently have to defend legislative victories against opponents who initiate lawsuits to overturn new legislation.
They typically lack the means to campaign and advocate against other interest organizations.
typically speak on behalf of a sizable group of persons with clout in court. routinely spend large quantities of money to promote candidates for state courts. They often lack the financial resources to advocate against other interest groups and participate in electioneering. usually speak on behalf of a large number of powerful people in the court.
often make significant financial contributions in support of state judicial candidates.
Learn more about public interest group;
brainly.com/question/23371109?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
