Answer:
The correct answer is: B. The news of the terrorist attack is directed to me. The terrorist are trying to warn me.
Explanation:
Ideas of reference also known as delusions of reference is a symptom of certain psychological and mental disorders and are characterized by the strong belief that innocuous events and circumstances are somehow directed or related to the individual who is experiencing it.
For example, a person with delusions of reference may believe that the news anchor is directly speaking to them through the Tv screen or that the lyrics of a song are particularly about them.
<u>In this particular case, the probable statement of the client that would have led the nurse to conclude that the client has ideas of reference is: B the news of the terrorist attack is directed to me. The terrorists are trying to warn me. </u>
Answer: Reduced his self-awareness
Explanation:
Reduction in self awareness occurred when an individual is slightly or mostly unaware of the happenings around them. This could be as a result of medical condition or a stimulant that affects their reasoning, they could return to normal after being relieved of the effect as it's mostly a temporary issue. Akiva could care less about the way he treated his family due to the effect of alcohol he took, this affected his system greatly and reduced his self awareness.
For me if any of the idea about the government were embraced by the founding generation today it would be the idea of providing free internet for all. Internet now has become a commodity for everybody thus if the government provide this it would be the greatest idea to have today.
<span>Hope my answer would be a great help for you.
If </span>you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
<span> </span>
Answer:
The appropriate alternative is Option A (the authority to execute the laws
).
Explanation:
- The philosophy through which the court system may proclaim unenforceable the actions of something like the justice department or perhaps the legislature.
- Besides obvious reasons, this same Supreme Court implemented this authority to repeal local ordinances that rejected this same constitutionally protected civil liberties.
All those other alternatives aren't related to the analysis in question. So the first one is the most appropriate.
