Answer:
Information levels
Explanation:
Ben works at a top accounting firm in Salt Lake City and his responsibilities include developing individual and departmental goals, and generating financial analysis across departments and the enterprise as a whole. Ben's duties provide value-added to his company and would be categorized as different information levels
Ben has to manage information on what we can say three different level; individual level which is developing individual goals, team or business unit , which according to the question is departmental goals and generating financial analysis across deparments and on a corporate level, which is the enterprise as a whole which will be reviewed by the executive teamand adding value to the company as a whole.
Answer:
Specialty goods are the products which require high efforts in purchasing because their cost is certainly high, consumers cant take a risk of buying them frequently, like sporting cars, high end cameras, luxury high end clothing etc. There are many industries in specialty goods in which you can see intense level of rivalry. For example, in sporting cars, you have multiple brands which have very severe kind of rivalry like Jaguar and BMW - Lexus and Lotus, they not compete in cars but they compete in their advertisements, evenest as well.
Whereas, when you consider, photographic camera industry, you will also find intense kind of rivalry between Canon and Sony, Leica and Olympus. Here they not only face direct competition from other camera brands, but they also have to face competition from the cell phone industry, which also provide high end cameras in their cell phones like iPhone, Samsung and Oppo etc.
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Answer: Shanice is conving the team that their behavior will harm the company since it will disturb Research and Development projects, specially concerning time and energy management. By taking this step, <u>in a non-aggressive way she is demanding that the team takes new attitudes towards their jobs and the project itself.</u>
