<span>d, Polk made an agreement that the border between the U.S and British Columbia was set at the 49th parallel. the reason why was that Great Britain still had a small ammount of territory within the boundaries of the northern United …</span>
US stance on the French intervention in Mexico is to avoid the direct conflict with the France and US have become silent and doing no innervation in the Mexican affairs, but they also remained neutral in the conflict.
<h3>How did the United States respond to the French takeover of Mexico?</h3>
Abraham Lincoln has denied acknowledging the Maximilian and French meddling in Mexican affairs. Lincoln saw this as a contravention of the Monroe Doctrine, which alerted European countries that the US would not endure further meddling in Western Hemisphere countries.
Thus, US stance on the French intervention in Mexico is to avoid the direct conflict.
For more details about the United States respond to the French takeover of Mexico, click here:
brainly.com/question/1286959
#SPJ4
Answer: The answer is:
because they developed strategies to resist slavery, which included work slow downs, running away, and violent revolts
Explanation:
Some enslaved people dealt with the trauma of their situation by actively resisting their condition—whether by defying their owners or running away.
Enslaved people everywhere resisted their exploitation and attempted to gain freedom.
Answer: Galileo was able to observe that not every moving body circled the Earth
Explanation:
Galileo noticed with the help of a telescope (which was invented earlier) that the moons of the Jupiter were orbiting Jupiter. By this analogy, he concluded that the planets orbit the sun, which is not a relevant scientific proof but a hypothesis.
He faced the problem because he could not perceive that the planets were orbiting the sun similarly. So this part of the theory could not be proved in any way.
Answer: As a result of the Boston Tea Party, the British shut down Boston Harbor until all of the 340 chests of British East India Company tea were paid for. This was implemented under the 1774 intolerable acts and known as the Boston port act.
Explanation: On March 25, 1774, British Parliament passes the Boston Port Act, closing the port of Boston and demanding that the city's residents pay for the nearly $1 million worth (in today's money) of tea dumped into Boston Harbor during the Boston Tea Party of December 16, 1773.