1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kobusy [5.1K]
3 years ago
11

What is 394839348 + 3948593992934

Mathematics
2 answers:
kramer3 years ago
7 0
It's 3,948,988,832,282 Hope this is right. :) 
MAXImum [283]3 years ago
6 0
3943988832282  I think that this is the write answer good luck
You might be interested in
2ax-b=cx+d solve for x​
Alexxandr [17]

Answer:

x = (d + b) / (2a - c)

Step-by-step explanation:

2ax-b = cx+d

2ax - cx = d + b

x (2a-c) = d + b

x = (d + b) / (2a - c)

7 0
3 years ago
6.493 rounded to the hundredths
Nana76 [90]
The answer is 6. 49 you welcome :)
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A 2012 Gallup poll surveyed Americans about their employment status and whether or not they have diabetes. The survey results in
posledela

A) See picture for the table.

To make the table, multiply 47774 by 1.5% to get total that have diabetes and multiply 5855 by 2.5% to get total unemployed that have it, then using subtraction fill in the other squares of the table.

B)

Hypothesis:

H0: No association between employment and diabetes.

H1: Association between the two

Using a graphing calculator or Excel, run a chi-test.

Chi squared equals 31.844 with 1 degrees of freedom.

 The two-tailed P value is less than 0.0001

With this information we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude there is an association between diabetes and employment.

C)

Although there is a statistical significance, there really is no practical significance between an incidence rate of 1.5 or 2.5%

3 0
3 years ago
Which expression is equivalent to the following expression: 15 + 6x A. 3(5 +2x) B. 3(5 + 6x) C. 21x D. 15(6x)​
Makovka662 [10]
It’s on photomath ifyou have it
7 0
3 years ago
Verdadero o falso: Q (números racionales) ∩ I (números irracionales) = Ø. Porque?
ozzi

Answer:

I think true but can u translate to english so I could understand

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Manila walked 4 miles an hour and arrived home in 30 minutes. Her sister ran 6 miles an hour, how long did it take for her to ge
    14·1 answer
  • How to write 'the sum of z and 7' in an algebric expression?
    14·2 answers
  • <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Coverline%7BAB%7D" id="TexFormula1" title="\overline{AB}" alt="\overline{AB}" align="absmidd
    6·2 answers
  • A ball is thrown from a height of 105 feet with an initial downward velocity of 9 ft/s. The ball's height h (in feet) after t se
    13·1 answer
  • Will Give Brainliest. Type the correct answer in each box. Round your answers to the nearest whole number.
    8·1 answer
  • Can someone please explain to me how to find y-intercept on a graph? I AM SO CONFUSED PLEASE HELP!!!
    5·1 answer
  • Hiiioo can someone please help!❤️ <br><br> -Boopy!
    13·1 answer
  • I am 45 I have 25 ones how many tens do I have
    13·2 answers
  • Multiply:<br><br> 2 1/4 x 1 1/2 x 5/3=?
    8·1 answer
  • The graph of y= 3 + 2x -x is shown.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!