Answer:
B
Explanation:
It really depends on what was underlined. There are two possibilities.
- I think that not a single peace loving State could decline a peace treaty with a neighboring State even though the latter was headed by such fiends and cannibals as Hitler and Ribbentrop.
- Non-aggression pacts are pacts of peace between two States. It was such a pact that Germany proposed to us in 1939.
The first one is irony of the highest order. Though Stalin was correct in his assessment of Hitler and Ribbentrop, he didn't include himself (who may have been the worst of the three), in his description.
The second one is just a definition of what a non-aggression pact was.
I would pick B. The real problem is what is underlined. B is the truth. It was actually Hitler's plan to invade Russia long before it happened. Not only that, he was so confident of victory that he did not order his textile industry to make protective clothing when he did invade Russia. He thought it would be over in Russia long before such clothing was needed.
Answer:
Vacuous
Explanation:
A statement that lacks any meaning can be called vacuous.
Cybercards are most useful for TRACKING INTERNET-BASED RESEARCH.
Cybercard note-taking makes possible the following tasks:
1) highlighting and taking notes directly on a webpage2) organizing information collected with tags
<span>3) searching your collection of notes, tags, and webpages</span>
In Fahrenheit 451, Bradbury uses mythological allusions to represent the veiled corruption in society. These allusions show the irony of how the people yearn for and need knowledge, yet they burn and despise books. ... Not everyone born free and equal, as the Constitution says, but as everyone made equal”
