Absolutely not!
Your hypothesis is your educated guess on how the experiment will go. If in the end of your experiment, you find that your hypothesis was not supported, that does not make you wrong.
I hope this helps!
Their gravitational pull towards the planet?
This is a issue of morality and ethics. So the answer to the first question depends on the perspective of the person. Personally I don't agree with performance enhancing drug use but I do think some of the expectations of athletes who perform in Olympic events increase the pressure to have to use them. So do I think people who use these drugs should be elected into the Hall of Fame. That is hard to answer. But I do not think using drugs takes away all of the achievement an athlete has made. It just proves that the athlete couldn't achieve the rigid sport performance without manipulation. But it doesn't mean they haven't worked hard or trained.
I do think rules should be made for athletes. These rules would definitely weave through most of the athletes we see doing these out of the world sport records every day. That is because many of them have been proven to have used these performance enhancing drugs.
Please vote my answer brainliest. thanks!
The answer for this is B. Gravity has nothing to do with weight
Answer:
Incisors: 1. These teeth help in biting the food. 2. They are total 8 in number- four in each jaw. Canines: 1. These teeth help in tearing the food. 2. They are total 4 in number- 2 in each jaw.