1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marishachu [46]
3 years ago
15

Craig, one of the senior managers at Clayton Inc., insisted that company supervisors handle employee relations as part of their

jobs. Which of the following statements strengthens Craig's argument?Select one:a. The supervisors represent the company on a day-to-day basis.b. The supervisors have the business experience to take up additional responsibilities. (incorrect)c. The supervisors do not hold any stakes in the organization.d. The supervisors are not a part of the employees' union.e. The supervisors are responsible for any action taken by the employees. (Incorrect)
Business
1 answer:
Alekssandra [29.7K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The supervisors represent the company on a day-to-day basis.

Explanation:

Craig said that the supervisors take employee relations as part of their jobs.

The option that buttresses this is that supervisors represent the company on a day-to-day basis. Meaning the supervisors as owners of the company, and as if they have a stake. Supervisors taking ownership presupposes they perform tasks like handling employee relations to ensure the business and the employee work harmoniously.

You might be interested in
Which of the following characteristics apply to taxable fringe benefits? (Check all that apply.)
EleoNora [17]

Answer:

Employers treat the taxable fringe benefits the same as cash compensation.

Explanation:

Taxable fringe benefits "are included in gross income and subject to federal withholding, social security, and Medicare taxes".

Fringe benefits are "perks and additions to normal compensation that companies give their employees, such as life insurance, tuition assistance, or employee discounts".

* The cost of the taxable fringe benefit is deductible to the employer, not the value of the benefit to the employee.

FALSE,  the taxable fringe benefit is not deductible from the employer.

* Employers treat the taxable fringe benefits the same as cash compensation.

TRUE, and as we can see on the definition above the taxable fringe benefits are treated as a compensation that comapnies giv their employees.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is NOT true of a department in the merchandise classification scheme? it is the second level i
Eva8 [605]
The first one is true I think
7 0
3 years ago
"The Marlene Doll Co. uses a process costing system. Consider the following data for Dept. A. UNITS: W-1-P Nov. 1: 8,000 units,
Law Incorporation [45]

Answer:

The Marlene Doll Co.

Weighted-AVerage Method

Cost of production:

COSTS: W-1-P Nov. 1:                    $9,600         $4,800

Costs added in November:           15,600         14,400

Total costs for the month          $25,500       $19,200

Equivalent units of production:

                                       Units   Materials  Conversion

Transferred to Dept B: 12,000     12,000        12,000

W-1-P Nov. 30:               6,000       6,000         3,000

Equivalent units                            18,000        15,000

Cost per equivalent units:

                                            Materials    Conversion

Total costs for the month   $25,500       $19,200

Equivalent units                      18,000         15,000

Cost per equivalent unit       $1.42           $1.28

Costs assigned to:

Units Transferred to Dept B:  $17,040      $15,360              $32,400

                                     (12,000 *$1.42)     (12,000 * $1.28)  

W-1-P Nov. 30:                           8,520           3,840                 12,360

                                     (6,000 *$1.42)     (3,000 * $1.28)

Total costs assigned           $25,560       $19,200              $44,760

 

FIFO Method

Equivalent units of production:

                                                Units   Materials  Conversion

W-1-P Nov. 1:                           8,000      0 (0%)        2,000  (25%)

Units started & completed: 10,000     10,000        10,000

W-1-P Nov. 30:                       6,000      6,000         3,000

Equivalent units                                   16,000        15,000

Cost per equivalent units:

                                            Materials    Conversion

Total costs for the month    $15,600         14,400

Equivalent units                      16,000        15,000

Cost per equivalent unit       $0.975        $0.96

Costs assigned this month to:

Work-in-Process                      $0                 $1,920                $1,920

                                     (0 *$0.975)         (2,000 * $0.96)  

Units completed                      $9,750        $9,600              $19,350

                                     (10,000 *$0.975)   (10,000 * $0.96)  

W-1-P Nov. 30:                           5,850           2,880                 8,730

                                     (6,000 *$0.975)    (3,000 * $0.96)

Total costs assigned            $15,600        $14,400            $30,000

Total costs of:

Units transferred out         $19,350       $16,320         $35,670

W-1-P Nov. 30:                       5,850           2,880              8,730

Total costs                        $25,200       $19,200         $44,400

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Dept. A. UNITS:

                                        Units   Materials  Conversion

W-1-P Nov. 1:                    8,000      100%           75%

Started in November:   10,000

Transferred to Dept B: 12,000      100%          100%

W-1-P Nov. 30:                6,000      100%           50%

6 0
3 years ago
Too much planning on the job can get in the way of enjoying things.
Lemur [1.5K]
If its true or false its true
5 0
4 years ago
Emily/red sued document security company, alleging he had suffered injuries to his hands as a result of attempting to fix a jam
Darya [45]
<span>Emily has no case as Toyosan's safety equipment (the airbag) deployed correctly. The safety equipment is there to save lives and reduce serious injury, not eliminate damage completely. Emily would need to sue the driver that caused the accident.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Dumphy and Funke are rival tattoo artists in the small town of Feline. There are no other tattoo artists in town. It costs $30 t
    12·1 answer
  • The demand for labor depends primarily on the additional output produced as a result of hiring an additional worker and A. the a
    7·1 answer
  • Activity-based costing strives to create an environment that
    8·1 answer
  • Richard created an advertisement that included a scientific explanation of how clothes are cleaned beside the image of washing m
    14·2 answers
  • When employees are unclear about work methods, scheduling, and performance criteria because others hold different ideas about th
    12·1 answer
  • Required information The Foundational 15 [LO6-1, LO6-2, LO6-3, LO6-4, LO6-5] [The following information applies to the questions
    9·1 answer
  • What are the disadvantages of journal entry​
    12·1 answer
  • What can a speaker do to ensure that they are respectful of their audience, especially when speaking to a skeptical audience or
    8·1 answer
  • Two-Stage ABC for Manufacturing: Reassigning Costs to Cost Objectives National Technology, LTD. has developed the following acti
    8·1 answer
  • Cedrick's credit card was​ stolen, and he did not realize that it was stolen until he received his most recent billing stateme
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!