Answer:
dysfunction; promotes sexism
Explanation:
The answer is
dysfunction; promotes sexism
Karl Marx is known as the father of social conflict theory. According to the conflict theory, there are very limited resources and inequality in the society and people are in a state of a never ending conflict they focuses mainly on this resources in the society.
Conflict theorists claims that the society is maintain by the power and domination instead of conformity and consensus.
Social conflict theory claims that the passages given in the context is a abnormality or a dysfunction of the system called the society because it promotes the dominion of the men to the women that leads to promotes sexism when wives are asks to submit themselves to their husbands in the name of the religion.
Thus the answer is --
dysfunction; promotes sexism
Answer:
Obsessive-compulsive
Explanation:
Obsessions
This is simply known as a repetitive and intruding thoughts, ideas, impulses, or images etc. The common obsessions found in children includes contamination, fears of harm to self or others, different sort of concerns etc. In adolescence, common obsessions are commonly known as sexual, somatic, and religious preoccupations.
Compulsions
intruding and intentional behaviors that are carried out due to an obsession.
<h2>Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)
</h2>
This is simply refered to as a form of recurrent, invasive and interrupting thoughts that leads to anxiety that is followed by other ritualized behavior so as to suppress the anxiety. Children with OCD are time-consuming that is they take more than 1 hour a day when preparing them and they have an often disturbing obsessions and compulsions.
Research study related physical and mental disorder
The case changed the Georgia flag because the case was an attempt to end segregation in schools, but Georgia officials wanted to keep segregation and strengthen JC Laws. The GA flag was made to show resistance to integration, after the case was settled they had to change it.
Answer:
Piercing the corporate veil
Explanation:
This are the options that come with this question:
- hiding behind the corporate skirt.
- whistleblowing.
- piercing the corporate veil.
- limited liability.
This is an example of the doctrine of "piercing the corporate veil." This describes a situation in which the shareholders of a corporation can be held personally liable for the debts and liabilities of a corporation, according to a court. This is in contrast to common practice in corporations, which assumes that, if a corporation is sued, the shareholders cannot be brought into the lawsuit. "Piercing the corporate veil" usually occurs in the case of fraud, or in the case of egregious and willful activity that put corporate gain over the public good.
