It should be noted that a judicial philosophy in which a justice is more likely to let stand the decisions of other government branches is known as judicial activism.
On the other hand, a judicial philosophy in which a justice is more likely to overturn decisions or rule actions by the other branches unconstitutional, especially in an attempt to broaden individual rights and liberties, is called judicial restraint.
Judicial restraint simply means the power of judicial review to set aside government acts. On the other hand, judicial restraint simply means the refusal to strike down such acts.
Learn more about judicial review on:
brainly.com/question/4937540
To detect bias you need to the character opinion and then go from there to see how there opinion be comes bias
May you explain to me what you need help with ?
Answer:
Below
Explanation:
The reason for limiting authority is so that the leaders or the one who makes the authority will have overall power and all authority. This way people cant make laws of their own or take place in society wher they dont belong.
Federalism champions big government. in this system, the officials are in power and supposedly know best, so they have the power. Madison, Adams, and a few others liked this idea. washington, jefferson, and Franklin for sure did not support federalism.
