Yes, I agree with their decision because under the articles of Confederation, the central government had virtually no power. They couldn't enforce federal laws on the states. They couldn't tax and each state could issue it's own money. It would have wreaked havoc on the economy and it would not have lead to effective government. The articles were just fundamentally flawed.
Answer:
I don't know th answer to your question but it is a good question
Answer:
Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that successfully challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine of racial segregation established by the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson. The case was influential in the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education four years later.
hope this helps !!
The American soldiers are seen applauding suggests that the artist of the painting is most likely an American
.
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The picture suggests that it was painted by an American because there are American soldiers and people in the background who are applauding when the flag is being hoisted. This means that the picture is taken from the American War of Independence.
The picture might symbolize victory over a particular war or celebration of the independence of the thirteen colonies which were occupied by the British as below the American flag there is the Union Jack i.e., the flag of the United Kingdom
.