Answer:
Option 2 is the right answer
Explanation:
When government obtains any evidence though a conduct deemed unconstitutional (unlawful search or seizure), such evidence would be suppressed by the court. When the defendant is brought to court for eventual trial, such evidence would be inadmissible. U.S courts have used this rule in several occasions, to prevent police officers and agents of the government from abusing constitutional rights of the people.
Answer:
Could change the jurors' final verdict
Explanation:
Answer: B
Explanation: Inspecting the car is not typically apart of determining whether or not someone is under the influence unless they have unreasonable doubt that the driver is under the influence of something and they need to find out what incase it isn't alcohol
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Ambiguity in contracts can be voided if subjected to more than one interpretation and may be dismissed as evidence if the court has determined the Contract falls under ambiguity.
