1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
horsena [70]
3 years ago
15

On January 15, 1990, Anders brought an action against Barnes for breach of a contract for the sale of electronic parts. The brea

ch occurred on January 10, 1986, and Anders discovered the breach on January 20, 1986. The state statute of limitations for contract actions is five years. Barnes raised the UCC statute of limitations as a defense to the action. DISCUSS, Is this defense valid? WHY 0R WHY NOT...WHAT ARE THE LEGAL ISSUES?
Law
1 answer:
Dvinal [7]3 years ago
6 0

ANSWER: The defence is not valid, because the time for any state status of limitations for contract action starts when all facts about the breach has been found, and it has been concluded that a breach of contract actually happened. The time does not start when the breach happened, but when facts has been generated to show that a breach actually happened.

The plaintiff actually have more 5 days to file his case because the fact about the breach was known on the 20th of January, 1986 and his case is filed in the court on 15th of January 1990.

Therefore the plaintiff case is valid, and should be processed by the court, while the defendant defence is invalid and should be ignored by the court.

You might be interested in
How are REPUBLICANS and SOCIALIST alike?
olchik [2.2K]

Answer:

they arent at all, republicans and even democrats are prp=capitalists, while socialists want the commodity form to be abloished + for the means of production to owned by the WORKERS (not the government)

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why is the state of Florida prohibited from giving special privileges or protections to any one group of people?
Anastaziya [24]
The answer is a but don’t quote me on that
8 0
3 years ago
Can a person be forced to testify in a criminal case or a civil case?
devlian [24]

Answer: The person testifying is the defendant in a criminal case: This is an extension of the protection under the Fifth Amendment. Criminal defendants can never be forced to testify. The witness is married to someone involved in the case: Communication between two spouses is considered privileged by courts.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
To which of the following would Kant and Nozick agree?
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer:

Although Robert Nozick did not consider himself to be primarily a political philosopher, he is best known for his contributions to it. Undoubtedly, Nozick’s work in epistemology and metaphysics (especially with respect to free will and the “closest continuer” theory of personal identity) has had a significant impact on those fields. However, it was the publication of his first book, Anarchy, State and Utopia (1974) that revitalized the political right-wing and set off a firestorm of critical replies and commentaries. While Nozick’s accomplishments reach far beyond the confines of political philosophy, it is safe to say that most recognize him for his work on attempting to provide a justification for the state, setting the limits of government, and trying to convince us that accepting his minimal state could foster a framework for a constellation of communities constituting a sort of utopia.

Anarchy, State and Utopia can also be seen as a critical response to John Rawls’ Theory of Justice, which was published just three years earlier and was considered to be the most robust and sophisticated defense of liberal egalitarianism. Although many credit Rawls for single-handedly rekindling interest in political philosophy, this is likely overstated praise. There is little doubt that Nozick’s systematic criticism of Rawls’ theory of justice and establishment of a rival political theory in Anarchy, State and Utopia also played a major role in bring significant attention back to political philosophy.

8 0
3 years ago
Independent contractors are required to be covered by a workers' compensation plan.
Cloud [144]

Answer:

false

Explanation:

False. Independent Contractors need not to be covered.

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which cases would be heard first in an u.S. District court?
    15·1 answer
  • List the seven grave sins​
    12·1 answer
  • Examine some of the difficulties in the financial system in Ghana and how it has been addressed?
    9·1 answer
  • phân tích nhiệm vụ, quyền hạn của Viện kiểm sát khi thực hành quyền công tố trong giai đoạn truy tố ?
    11·1 answer
  • Can State Constitutions can provide fewer rights to individuals than the U.S.Constitution?
    13·1 answer
  • June is a district attorney. One of the police officers she works with told her that he searched a residence without a search wa
    8·2 answers
  • Effective police work can be described most accurately as
    14·1 answer
  • What are the leading hazard associated with working around livestock?
    9·1 answer
  • F 12. Free Youngboy he back in the bars. I hate the law> fRRe my dawg
    10·2 answers
  • Match each example to the type of law it reflects.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!