<span>It celebrates the time when the Muslim invasion of Europe through Spain and southwest France was stopped and pushed back. The Muslims settled in Spain but couldn't go further north. That was long before the Crusades.</span>
It is probably more nearly correct to state that the Northern states offered more fertile soil for industrialization to grow and prosper than the South. The comments above about slavery are misstated. The Southern economy was indeed agrarian and dependent upon slave labor; however the reason for this is was that the economy in that portion of the country consisted of large scale plantations of staple crops, primarily cotton. It is manifestly incorrect to state that immigrants did not want to move to a slave society. Immigrants to this country came from agrarian economies, and would have preferred to continue that practice, however there was no available land in the South. It was under no circumstances a moral value judgment as the above answer alludes; they remained in large cities and worked in factories because they had no choice.
Slaves were in fact used for occasional factory work, including but not limited to the Tredegar Iron Works in Richmond, Va. Slaves also worked as blacksmiths, shipwrights, gin operators, carpenters, etc. The law of supply and demand , however, dictated that they were primarily used as plantation labor, not factory workers.
Industrialization was possible in the South, and it was indeed industrialized after Reconstruction, yet most of the workers were white; hardly any were former slaves.
Bottom line: industrialization came to the North because the North's climate, geography, etc. did not lend itself to large scale agriculture. Also, the North had an abundance of navigable streams which were absent in the South. The South was more suitable for large scale agriculture, and its economy developed in that fashion. Slavery was a necessary element in maintaining that economy; but it was not a value judgment.
Winston Churchill reluctant to open a western front against Germany because h<span>e remembered the slaughter on the Western Front in World War I.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
How did the drop in consumer demand affect the US economy?
The pace of economic growth has slowed to 2% due to a significant decrease in consumer expenditure. The US economy expanded at a 2% annualized rate in the third quarter, the weakest rate since the conclusion of the 2020 recession. Consumer expenditure and home investment slowdowns aided in keeping the figure low.
Surprisingly, in many ways. However it mostly depends on which country.
I'll give you an overall answer that all countries had in common.
For the most part, there was food regulations and a lot of "support your military" propaganda.
Food was scarce, and the military needed donations.
This also goes as far as bedding, vehicles, and communication devises.
I hope this helps! :)
