D. The Supreme Court of Washington is the final appeals court in the state(I believe)
The Supreme Court's additional powers to review decisions of the National Court (when an appeal is not available) and to consider references on constitutional issues, are given by the Constitution itself. Procedure in those cases is governed by Rules made by the Judges of the Supreme Court. (Hope this helps.)
Answer:
A. It would allow the delegates to speak openly and honestly with each other
D. It would prevent the delegates from being pressured by the public
Explanation:
A. It would allow the delegates to speak openly and honestly with each other
[] With the secrecy rule, the delegates could speak openly since this would not reach the public. It helped to let them make decisions since there was less pressure from the public (ties into option D).
D. It would prevent the delegates from being pressured by the public
[] If the public didn't know what was going on, they could not pressure
The second and third options do not make sense because the delegates wanted everyone to attend (they also wanted the votes to be as unanimous as possible) and they were not planning specific military strategies at this time.
Have a nice day!
I hope this is what you are looking for, but if not - comment! I will edit and update my answer accordingly.
- Heather
The arguments for US interventions abroad are always related to maintaining democracy and preventing the spread of ideologies or leaders that are threatening to the world.
<h3>What is a foreign intervention?</h3>
A foreign intervention is a type of international relationship between two or more nations that is based on the participation of an external country in the conflict or dispute of two or more nations or in internal conflicts such as civil wars.
The United States has been one of the countries that has carried out the most interventions abroad in some countries such as:
- Vietnam
- Cuba
- Korean
- Afghanistan
- Iraq
- France
- Chile
- PanamaAmong others.
The intervention of the United States in these conflicts has always been argued as a defense of democracy and the human rights of citizens.
For example, during the Cold War, they intervened in the Korean and Vietnam Civil War to prevent communism from spreading and putting democracy at risk.
Later, he made interventions in Middle Eastern countries to combat crime and terrorism of international organizations based on religion.
Learn more about interventions abroad in: brainly.com/question/506847
