Answer:
$61,640,000
Explanation:
Earning before tax:
= Net income ÷ 60%
= $148,000,000 ÷ 60%
= $246,666,667
EBIT:
= Earning before tax + Interest expense
= $246,666,667 + $46,000,000
= $292,666,667
EVA:
= EBIT(1 - t) - (Capital employed × cost of capital)
= $292,666,667(1 - 0.4) - ($1,036,000,000 × 11%)
= $175,600,000 - 113,960,000
= $61,640,000
The apps stated above will be marked as <u>Stars </u>on Under Armours Market Growth/Market Share matrix.
<h3>What do <u>STARS </u>mean on the Market Share/Market Growth/BCG Growth-Share Matrix?</h3>
The two keywords which define stars on the matrix are:
Any product that is projected as fast-growing and which comprises a huge portion of the market is referred to as "Stars" on the growth matrix.
Other categories of the growth matrix are:
- Cash Cows
- Dogs (Pets)
- Question Marks
Please see the link below for more about Market Growth Matrix:
brainly.com/question/24515909
Answer:1. The reason that the varsity team lost to JV team is lack of working together as a team.
2.Coach P. when selecting the rowers for the two teams should have looked at both the psychological(personality types and traits, if they are leader or followers etc.) as well as the physical aspect ( Stamina, Speed ,Coordination, Strength etc.) of each individual.
explanation:
1:Even though the varsity team consisted of the best individuals for speed , strength, coordination and endurance, they lacked the cohesiveness to perform as a unit. Each of the eight individual rowers had to be single-mindedly attuned to one another in order to synchronize their rowing and perform in unison. Unfortunately, the team also too many disruptor and lacked a leader.
2:The Coach should have experimented more by creating different scenarios to see how well the individuals responded and performed to one another in different situations when it came to a team environment. For example, putting the rowers in total control of the team's dynamics is the best hands on lesson they could ever experience. This would have allowed the rowers a deeper understanding what it take to be winner from a loser.
3.Coach P. should switch both the teams for Tuesday since after extensive observations and evaluation he has witnessed JV work as a better team. The JV team possessed better synergy, synchronization, and shared a common goal causing them to win more frequently than the Varsity team, despite the fact that the Varsity team had better individual members. In addition, there has been a precedent for switching boats. During the mid-1990’s, the Cornell Coach faced asimilar situation as Coach P. and as a result of him making the switch, both the JV and Varsity teams ended up winning the Eastern Championships. This demonstrates that it is more likely thatthe teams will win if they agree to switch. Moreover, even if Coach P. decided not to switch the teams, it would have taken quite a while to rebuild Varsity’s team structure, morale, and overall team synergy, implying that they probably would not have been ready in time to compete and win the race as the Varsity team anyway.
Answer:
The journal entry is shown below:
Explanation:
The journal entry is as follows
On January 15
Accounts receivable $5,356
To Note receivable $5,200
To Interest revenue $26
To Interest receivable $130
(Being cash received in respect of note receivable, interest accrual is recorded)
The computation of interest receivable is shown below:
= Principal × rate of interest × number of days ÷ (total number of days in a year)
= $5,200 × 12% × (75 days ÷ 360 days)
= $130
The 75 days is counted from October 17 to December 31
And, the total amount is
= Principal × rate of interest × number of days ÷ (total number of days in a year)
= $5,200 × 12% × (90 days ÷ 360 days)
= $156
