Answer: $10 per month
Explanation:
$10 would be an ideal amount for me to pay to have access to the various social media sites if the major sites are on offer.
I think this amount reasonable because I do not use social media all that much but I would still like access to a variety of them. I would essentially therefore, be paying for my reduced time on the net.
Some might say that the companies might not make a profit if they charge $10 a month but I think they will because they make most of their money from ads so it would be good for them to offer the lowest subscription prices so that they can capture more people which will appeal to advertisers.
The extra $2 that you saved on the $4.50 you were willing to pay for it represents consumer surplus. Consumer surplus is the difference between the total amount that a consumer is willing to pay for a good or service versus what they actually pay for the good or service. The $2 represents what the consumer was willing to pay for the milk.
To be honest I don’t even know I’m only doing this for a reason ............
Answer:
A) they primarily focus on the bottom line.
Explanation:
Most disruptive innovations are developed by entrepreneurs and relatively small firms. Many times these smaller firms end up being purchased by larger corporations that further develop or exploit these innovations.
That is true even for former entrepreneurs, like the founders of Google, who after becoming billionaires forgot about innovating, and decided that it was easier to purchase startups than to develop new services themselves.
Answer:
lending act
Explanation:
The 1968 Truth in Lending Act (TILA) is federal legislation of the Americas aimed at promoting knowledgeable use of customer loans by demanding revelations of its aspects and charges in order to optimize the calculation and dissemination of borrowing costs.
TILA also gives customers the right to terminate all credit transactions involving a lien on the primary residence of a borrower, controls some credit card activities, and offers a way to settle credit payment disputes reasonably and in good time. TILA would not control the fines that might be enforced on mortgage lending, with the exception of some heavy-cost mortgage lending.