If you need to navigate from the launchpad to to place that would help you get a refresher on what the duplicate command does, go to Help Docs.
<h3>What are Help Docs?</h3>
Help Docs are a utility in your browser that tell you more about tools that you don't have much information about. They tell you about different commands such as the DUPLICATE command and all you need to do is to search for the command and the information will be presented to you.
Community will not help you find out more about the DUPLICATE command directly because it involves talking to others in the community. Tech Support is only helpful if you have a problem with the ACL Analytics tool.
Options for this question are:
- Community
- Tech Support
- Help Docs
Find out more on ACL Analytics at brainly.com/question/14464816
#SPJ1
Answer:
Loans from France
Explanation:
Without the financial and military assistance provided by France the colonists would have fared much worse.
The king held the highest position in society and priests, warriors, and merchants were also part of the upper class. The Maya believed their rulers were related to gods. Rulers were involved in religious ceremonies, led battles, had beautiful clothing/jewelry, and Kings wore huge feather headdresses and capes of cotton, jaguar skins, and feathers. Priests led religious ceremonies and were the most educated. Warriors fought battles with animal headdresses, jade jewels, and jaguar skin capes on their red and black painted bodies. Merchants directed trade among the cities and organized the transportation and distribution of goods. Together the members of the upper class controlled the politics, religion, and ceremony.
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.