Answer:
isolation from other lands forced the Chinese people to depend on themselves to adapt to their environment.
Explanation:
mark me brainlest plz
<span>The religious revivals of the 19th
century were called revivalists. At that time the movement was called the Great
Awakening. This movement believed that reforms in society must occur to
eliminate evil. People anticipated the second coming of Jesus Christ and a new millennial
age will rise in society.
</span>
<span>Many people converted their religions because the
movement reflected Romanticism, something that appealed to the super-natural.
People back then strongly believed of the idea of a new age and enlightenment
and they reject skeptical rationalism and deism.</span>
Idk can you please claify the question? Its unclear
Fueling factories using something other than wood" since this greatly revolutionized production productivity.
Explanation:
Law does not function in vacuum. Law operates for and in the society; and it is influenced by the mores and attitudes of the society. Correspondingly, law is an instrument of social change. The law thus never can be static; it has to change constantly with the changes in the society. Judiciary plays a major role for this change since judges interpret and redefine the laws through their judicial decisions. The demands of the time and society become prominent factors for judge in the law interpretation process. Their judicial opinions consequently become precedents - 'settled' or 'established' law that can provide legal foundation for settling subsequent cases. Hence, those who are associated in the field of law have to read case judgments for their research or academic purposes.
Mere knowledge of legal rules is not enough to do research in law. It also needs the analytical skills to extract ratio, observation and to apply these principles in different factual situations. This paper endeavors to identify certain parameters, which by no means are exhaustive but are only enabling points which could help a researcher to read and understand the judicial opinion. To achieve the very purposes of reading, the yardstick is not mere the ability to read, but to comprehend very essence of what is written.
The author believes that when a judgment is written well with clarity and consistency, even a common man would be able to figure out the contours of law. Since the objective of any judgment or judicial opinion is justice, the judge's conveying skill and the reader's skill ought to converge upon a common end.
