The answer it the thesis. It explains what the entire essay will be about in one sentence.
Answer:
Ali sad para
Explanation:
Ali sad para was a great mountain climber. once he decided to so for scaling a mountain with some tourists. he went on k2 mountain for scaling and he didn't had oxygen mask to make it more thrilling, challenging for a new record. when they reached the at came 3 they clicked some picture and sended them to their family members, and the government after some while they again started to reach the summit. after 4-5 hour no connection was to be made with him and the tourists and they just disappeared. rescue tams were send by helicopter to find them it went till 2-3 day after that Ali sad para's family called his funeral. he was a great and strong climber who just vanished.
Theme : Little things can make a big difference
The argument that uses a non sequitur fallacy is C, "Regulations on motorists should be lifted because factories are a bigger source of pollution"
Explanation: Non sequitur fallacy is when the conclusion doesn't follow the premises. That said in different words, the premises is an irrelevant reason to support the conclusion.
So, as true as it is that factories are a bigger source of pollution, the conclusion does not follow from the premises. The fact that regulations on motorists should be lifted, does not necessarily mean that the reason to do that is that factories are a bigger source of pollution.
