1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vesna [10]
2 years ago
5

How did the Magna Carta place limits on the power of England's monarchy?

History
2 answers:
vagabundo [1.1K]2 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is B, "It guaranteed people rights that kings must respect."

saveliy_v [14]2 years ago
3 0

the answer is B... thank u

You might be interested in
How far was Nasser responsible for the outbreak of the Suez War of 1956? Please make it detailed i have to write a 600 word essa
dsp73

Answer:

The Suez crisis is often portrayed as Britain's last fling of the imperial dice.

Still, there were powerful figures in the "establishment" - a phrase coined in the early 1950s - who could not accept that Britain was no longer a first-rate power. Their case, in the context of the times, was persuasive: we had nuclear arms, a permanent seat on the UN security council, and military forces in both hemispheres. We remained a trading nation, with a vital interest in the global free passage of goods.

But there was another, darker, motive for intervention in Egypt: the sense of moral and military superiority which had accreted in the centuries of imperial expansion. Though it may now seem quaint and self-serving, there was a widespread and genuine feeling that Britain had responsibilities in its diminishing empire, to protect its peoples from communism and other forms of demagoguery.

Much more potently, there was ingrained racism. When the revolutionaries in Cairo dared to suggest that they would take charge of the Suez canal, the naked prejudice of the imperial era bubbled to the surface. The Egyptians, after all, were among the original targets of the epithet, "westernised oriental gentlemen. They were the Wogs.

King Farouk, the ruler of Egypt, was forced into exile in mid-1952. A year later, a group of army officers formally took over the government which they already controlled. The titular head of the junta was General Mohammed Neguib. The real power behind the new throne was an ambitious and visionary young colonel who dreamed of reasserting the dignity and freedom of the Arab nation, with Egypt at the heart of the renaissance. His name was Gamal Abdel Nasser.

Nasser's first target was the continued British military presence in the Suez canal zone. A source of bitter resentment among many Egyptians, that presence was a symbol of British imperial dominance since the 1880s. In 1954, having established himself as uncontested leader of Egypt, Nasser negotiated a new treaty, under which British forces would leave within 20 months.

At first, the largely peaceful transition of power in Egypt was little noticed in a world beset by turmoil and revolution.

Explanation:

Hope this helps.

7 0
2 years ago
5. What was one of the key terms of the Treaty of Paris?
Naily [24]
On September 3, 1783, three definitive treaties were signed—between Britain and the United States in Paris (the Treaty of Paris) and between Britain and France and Spain, respectively, at Versailles.
3 0
3 years ago
The army base in your town is over-crowded. The town council passed a law that anyone with an extra
labwork [276]

Amendment 3 - Quartering Soldiers

3 0
2 years ago
Negotiating treaties illustrates the president's role as ____.
Alona [7]
B. The president.................
5 0
2 years ago
How might life in the Americas have been different if the Ice Ages had not occurred?
Anna71 [15]

Answer:

hi how are you

The Missouri River would have flowed north across Canada. There would be no Hudson’s Bay. The Ohio River would not exist. Instead the “New” River of West Virginia would have flowed north to the St. Lawrence. There would be no Great Lakes.

The British colonies would have remained hemmed in along the Atlantic. There would be no easy access to the Mississippi and the interior might well have remained solidly French. If you did somehow get to the Mississippi, there would be no Missouri River to take you to the Rocky Mountains. There would be no Detroit, Chicago or Milwaukee.

you meant something like that?

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Someone answer this for me please
    12·2 answers
  • Growing conflict between the north and the south 1850-1860
    11·1 answer
  • __________ is the world's largest archipelago and has the fourth largest population of any country. Singapore The Philippines In
    14·1 answer
  • The phrase “born from Cadmus” is an example of _____. a motif a patronymic foreshadowing irony
    8·1 answer
  • Why did it take so long to get help to many of the hurricane victims
    13·2 answers
  • Check the statements that are true about John Cabot:
    7·1 answer
  • A map titled The Iberian Peninsula. Portugal, Spain, and France are labeled. Africa is below Spain. Portugal is to the left of S
    6·2 answers
  • 1 point
    7·2 answers
  • What are three minor political parties in the United States today?
    5·1 answer
  • What Ottawa Indian chief terrorized settlers on the frontier following the French and Indian War?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!