Three of the steps in decision making are- Identify the problem, Evaluate alternatives, and Making the decision. For example, if we are trying to choose to buy a dog or not we use those steps to help us choose our final decision.
With the 'Identify the problem' step, you should take a step back from the issue and realize what your issue is and why it's an issue. In our given example, our issue we are identifying is that we can not choose whether to get a dog or not. The things stopping us from getting a dog is our free-time, our travel issues, and disagreement with roommates.
With the 'Evaluate alternatives' step, you now should be choosing from the choices you have made into what we can do to make the best decision possible. In our example, for our travel issues we can hire a dog-sitter to watch over the dog while we are on vacations incase anything happens.
With the 'Making the decision' step, this is where after weighing pros and cons, finding alternatives, and a final conclusive: You make the choice. With our example, this is where we choose to buy the dog, or to not buy the dog.
<h2><u>If this helped, please remember to rate, heart, and mark my answer as brainliest if seen fit. Thank you!</u></h2>
Answer:
o no im NJ jjojjj Binion cop
Answer and Explanation:
Let's work with the third situation:
3. Older people contribute little to the society.
Let's disagree with it. It is hard to think of a person who has lived long as someone who has little to offer. Some people seem to spread this type of stereotyping focusing mainly on the fact that older people get to retire. They seem to view work as the main or only contribution anyone has to offer.
First, we could argue that older people have already done their part. They have worked - often times much more than they should have. I know of older people, for instance, who started to work when they were only 11 or 12 years old - of course, times were different then, and that was acceptable. So, claiming that retiring means not contributing is quite hypocritical.
Besides that, we can also think in terms of knowledge, wisdom, and experience. Although younger generations are tech savvy and have a more tolerant view of the world, they will never have certain experiences, will never understand certain situations or acquire a certain type of knowledge (unless they learn it from an older person).
The statement that best describes the relationship between the evidence in the two excerpts is:
- C The Just Mercy excerpt shows that funding for criminal justice systems is ineffective, while the “Wrongful Convictions” excerpt says the funding is necessary.
<h3>What is the relationship between the texts?</h3>
While the first text explains the parts of the criminal justice system that requires funding, the second excerpt shows that this criminal justice system was receiving a lot of unnecessary funding.
The first excerpt did not discuss the funding in a negative light.
Learn more about the criminal justice system here:
brainly.com/question/7207817
#SPJ1
Answer: Question 1.
Why speaker deny the king proposal?
Answer:
The speaker stated the king power as nothing so he denied the proposal of king.
Question 2.
What did the old man want? Was he successful in his bargain?
Answer:
The old man wanted to hire the speaker with his money. No, he was not successful in his bargain.
