The correct answer is turning point for the way the laws of colonial Virginia distinguished people of different races
In 1676, one hundred years before the declaration of independence, the state of Virginia was the scene of the so-called Bacon Rebellion, in which landowners, slaves and servants came together, and which can only be stifled with the dispatch of English troops. It began as a product of the demand of the wealthy landowner Nathaniel Bacon, whose properties were located in the border area, for a more effective war policy against "the Indian". This demand to local authorities extended to the denunciation of an unfair tax policy, the arbitrary distribution of public offices and the lack of protection for farmers against the indigenous threat, in “a mixture of populist resentment against the rich and border hatred against the Indians ”. (Apart from the huge historical-social distances, we could say that it is similar to a Trump that today rages against the political and economic establishment while agitating a strongly xenophobic and anti-immigrant program).
The significance of this rebellion was that it brought together a heterogeneous social spectrum, attracting the dissatisfaction of slaves and servants against their living conditions, showing a potentially dangerous social union. In addition to the problem of indigenous hostility and the danger of slave revolts, the colonial elite had to do with the class anger of the poor whites - the servants, the tenants, the urban poor, the landless, the taxpayers, soldiers and sailors. In fact, after the Bacon Rebellion in 1760, "eighteen new attempts were made to overthrow the colonial governments and eight black revolts in South Carolina and New York." (The Other History of the United States). In this context, racism was the preferred ideological artifact used by the dominant classes to prevent the development of these social ties. But under the strong fiscal pressure that ensued the wars waged by England, which increased poverty in the lower strata and affected sectors of the local elites, they began to defend nationalist ideals as a way to monopolize the extraction of resources while unleashing potential rebellions. depending on national unity.
Your answer is C.
On August 7, 1964, Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, authorizing President Johnson to take any measures he believed were necessary to retaliate and to promote the maintenance of international peace and security in southeast Asia.
Answer:
I think it's C, but that's just my guess. I hope you'll pass, and good luck to you!
The major function of the Grand Canal have during the Song Dynasty is the easier and cheaper transportation of rice. Thus, the correct option is C). Easier and cheaper transportation of rice.
<h3>What is the Grand Canal?</h3>
The Grand Canal is famous worldwide canal, which was built by the laborers and also connected the Yellow River in the north with the Yangtze River in the south. It played a huge role in reunifying north and south China.
Canal is a great means of commerce and transportation between North China and Southern China. It made it much easier to transport grain from the south to the centers of political and military power in north China.
The Grand Canal was built during the period of the Song dynasty that connected the south and north Chinese territory. This canal enabled a much faster resupply of the capital in the north.
Learn more about Grand Canal here:-
brainly.com/question/15171254
#SPJ1
TWO rights in the Bill of Rights that can potentially be violated by the implementation of mandatory vaccination policies are:
- Freedom of religion
- Right to be protected from harm.
<h3>What is the Bill of Rights?</h3>
America's Bill of Rights refers to the first ten Amendments to the United States Constitution.
The Bill of Rights defines Americans' rights vis-a-vis their government.
The Bill of Rights guarantees civil rights and liberties, including freedom of speech, press, and religion.
Those who argue against vaccination recognize that their religious freedom and their right to be protected from harm could be violated with mandatory vaccinations.
Thus, the TWO rights in the Bill of Rights that can potentially be violated by the implementation of mandatory vaccination policies are <u>freedom</u><u> of religion</u> and the <u>right</u><u> to be protected from harm</u>.
Learn more about the Bill of Rights at brainly.com/question/493206
