The answer is B, as the sentences do not show cause and effect, set up a comparison, or introduce an idea that has already been brought up.
According to a different source, this question refers to the Brown v. Board of Education decision. In this case, the court issued a unanimous decision in favor of the Brown family. This decision was written by Chief Justice Earl Warren.
I would argue that Warren's rhetoric is persuasive and authoritative. He very clearly explains the reasons why the Court reached this decision. This conveys a feeling of knowledge and clarity. The line that I find most moving is:
<em>"To separate [black children] from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely to ever be undone."</em>
I find this line to be very powerful because it gets to the source of the problem. By explaining how black children might feel, it encourages people to rethink segregation. It also supports the idea that all people are equally valuable, regardless of their color.
Answer:
Researched and wrote are the verbs. Jorgi and speech are nouns
Explanation:
Answer:
There is a written record that somebody named “Ahlers” knew about Frank's hiding spot and how they had gone into hiding. Ahlers reportedly told his older brother, Cas, that he had betrayed the Franks during the war.
Explanation:
