The appropriate response is contextual perspective. It alludes to the investigation of living beings connecting in and with an authentic and current situational setting. It is an approach in light of contextualism, a reasoning in which any occasion is translated as a continuous demonstration indivisible from its present and authentic setting and in which a drastically useful way to deal with truth and significance is received.
<h2>
Answer: "skintone world"</h2>
We live in a world,
a skin tone world,
A world that people treat you a different way because of your skin tone,
We live in a world,
The skintone world,
A world that if you are white and you get mad and go off your a so called, "KAREN",
We live in a world,
A skintone world,
A world that if you are black and decides to wear all black people think your up to something to get in trouble,
We live in this world,
Its called the skintone world,
It is known for always have something wrong with a skintone,
we live in this world,
the skintone world.
Answer:
Options number 2 and 3 are correct.
Explanation:
These are two different sentences and you already mentioned that the origional sentence had a comma splice, so option 1 is incorrect. A semicolin can always be used for joining two complete sentences, so option 2 is correct. These are two complete sentences, so option 3 is definitely correct. Option 4 has a sentence that has two complete sentences joined together without any puncuation, which is incorrect, so Options 2 and 3 are correct.
I'd go with the first option, because if you are writing a first-person you are using the word I a lot. and that gets kind of boring.
