The setting of small fires was a common way to clear forest land for
farming and railroad construction. The whole summer of 1871 was
unusually dry, and all the trees and grass were unusually flammable.
The high winds that blew in with a cold front on October 8 of that year
whipped up many small fires into a single enormous one, which killed
between 1,500 and 2,500 people.
That was the same day as the great Chicago fire, and there were also
major fires on the same day on the other side of Lake Michigan, that
destroyed large parts of towns in Michigan.
One rhetorical appeal in Anthony's speech that is ineffective is her use of pathos. In describing the American government as the most hateful aristocracy ever established on the face of the globe, she made an assumption that was likely unfounded.
<h3>What ineffective rhetorical appeal was used by Anthony?</h3>
In her speech about women's right to vote, we can see that Susan B. Anthony employed pathos to raise the emotions of the people toward the government who did not yet understand the need to allow women to vote. We can see in her argument that she used an appeal to emotions by describing the government in very strong and hateful terms.
This would have hurt her argument because the audience might have been enraged at such a description of the government. Anthony should have stuck to logical reasoning to improve the weight of her argument. This would have gained more acceptance.
Learn more about Susan B. Anthony here:
brainly.com/question/14130938
#SPJ1
Answer:
hi i
ll givr brainliest to you if u give to me oof i worte it wrong too lazy-
Explanation:
to identify passive voice insert "by zombies" in after the verb and if it still makes sense u have passive voice
so i think it would be active
Answer: Bandwagon
Bandwagon fallacy assumes that the opinion of the majority is always right. It is also called an <em>appeal to popularity</em>, or <em>argumentum ad populum</em>. The problem with this line of thinking is that this type of argument only proves that a position is "popular," but it says nothing about whether it is "true." In this case, the argument offered for eating Lunch Nibbles is simply that everyone is doing it, instead of discussing the actual benefits of Lunch Nibbles.
