I believe the answer is C to reduce divisions related to race, ethnicity, or economic situations
Answer:
Uhh hello? We never read that lesson so don't expect us to be demigods to figure out what you're talking about. Either post with the textbook or I don't think anyone in this world can answer these child level questions.
The shock that happened over the Boston Massacre was not defended, as I would see it. This is on the grounds that there was proof highlighting the way that the fighters were incited to fire and were being bugged by the homesteaders. The warriors were being hollered at to discharge and the rest went like dominos in light of the fact that once the originally shot was shot, serious trouble come to the surface.
Not plagiarized so you can just add it :)
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the name of the individual who expresses the argument of liberty. Who are you referring to?
It could be anyone, A politician, a founding father, a diplomat, a freedom fighter, a Patriot. Who?
Trying to help you, we can comment on the following.
Doing some research, there is a concept of Liberty expressed by Federalists Founding Father James Madison in one of the Federalist's Papers. James Madison wrote: "Liberty... is essential to [factions] existence”
What Madison tried to say with that quote was that every faction was the product of a way of thinking, of a political belief system expressed with liberty. And that political factions were the result of the ideas of men who freely decided what could be the best for the country and that is why they formed factions or political parties, to support these ideas and present them to the American people.