Ask question

Ask question

All categories

4 years ago

12

Claire thinks that if she draws a parallelogram with 2 congruent sides, it must be a rhombus. Jacob thinks that she would need t

o draw a parallelogram with at least 3 congruent sides before she could be sure it was a rhombus. Who is correct, if anyone, and why?

1 answer:

MaRussiya [10]4 years ago

5 0

Yes it is ok if she draws a parallelogram

You might be interested in

The following is a frequency data set for tests scores in a small class. Construct a cumulative frequency plot displaying the da

egoroff_w [7]

The value of cumulative frequency is the sum of all previous frequencies. We should have 26 at the end of the table because all frequency add up to 26
To graph the cumulative frequency, we would need the plots.
Use the end of value range against the cumulative frequency valueRange 40-49, use the value 49 against the cumulative frequency 1
(49, 1)(59, 3)(69, 5)(79, 12)(89, 21)(99, 26)
Plot these on graph and connect them as a curve.

8 0

3 years ago

A local clothing shop is marking down all of its summer clothes by 75%. sarah would like to purchase a swimsuit that is original

PilotLPTM [1.2K]

A =$20 B=$8 C= $12.......

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A recursion formula and the initial term of a sequence are given. Write out the first five terms of the sequence. a Subscript fo

Lelu [443]

Answer:

6, -6, 6, -6 and 6.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the recursion formula for a sequence

$a_{n+1}=-a_n\\$where a_1=6\\$

The first five terms of the sequence are:

$\text{First Term, }a_1=6\\$Second Term, a_2=a_{1+1}=-a_1=-6\\$Third term, a_3=a_{2+1}=-a_2=6\\$Fourth term, a_4=a_{3+1}=-a_3=-6\\$Fifth term, a_5=a_{4+1}=-a_4=6$

Therefore, the first five terms of the sequence:

$a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4,a_5=6, -6, 6, -6$ and 6.$

4 0

3 years ago

Ellie took a taxi from her house to the airport. The taxi company charged a pick-up fee of $1.50 plus $5 per mile. The total far

abruzzese [7]

Answer:

5x= 76.5-1.5

So, m=15m

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Give a reason why the number 0.393993999399993999993… is irrational

Zigmanuir [339]

It never ends. it is a never ending number and those aren’t rational

7 0

3 years ago