Answer:
Lots of people would not have the care they need for illnesses and diseases. A Republican president would have appointed conservatives to the Supreme Court. Roe vs Wade would be overturned by now. Voting rights would have been taken out from minorities. A large amount of veterans would still be fighting in Iraq.
The keystone would be working. Clean air would be harder to be sure of because major corporations would have few watchdogs. No "equal rights or pay for Women" law would have been signed. Industrial accidents would be no big deal. Corporations would pay a big amount and that would probably be all.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!
~Kweenie~
How you answer that question depends much on your political point of view. A 2006 article by Ron Haskins, published by the conservative Brookings Institute, declared the 1996 welfare reforms a success. Haskins pointed to evidence such as a 60% decline in the welfare caseload by 2004 as a result of the 1996 reforms. He also pointed to studies indicating that 60 to 80% of adults leaving welfare are gainfully employed.
Meanwhile, liberal writers such as Peter Edelman and Barbara Ehrenreich, writing in the <em>Washington Post </em>(<span>December 6, 2009), have said that welfare reform failed, because the number of those living in poverty in America rose in the years following welfare reform. The lack of access to welfare contributed to that rise in poverty, they argue. It's harder for people to get cash assistance through Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (which is what welfare was renamed). But dependence on food stamps doubled in the years after Clinton left office.
So "success" or "disaster" will depend on whether viewed through a conservative or liberal lens.</span>
Had a lot of land and now it got taken most of it
