Answer:
Nominal gross domestic product (GDP) measures the market value of all the new and legal goods and services produced in a country within a year. While real GDP adjusts nominal GDP to inflation. Since inflation is generally positive, real GDP decreases as inflation increases. The higher the inflation rate, the larger the difference between nominal and real GDP. Depending on which year is used as base year (year 0), the difference that existed in 2010 can be either significant or not.
The difference = ($14,657 / $13,245) - 1 = 10.66%, which means that nominal GDP was 10.66% higher than real GDP. If the base year is 2000 or even 2005/6, the difference is very small since the accumulated inflation would only be 10.66% for all these years. But if the base year was 2008 or even 2009, then the inflation rate is high.
Answer:
Answer of each requirement is given seperatly below.
a What is the value of Siebel using the DCF method?
Value under DCF = CF * (1+growth rate)/ (WAAC" -Growth rate)
Putting values (assuming after tax earning is all in cash)
Value of SI = 25 (1+6%)/ 20%-6% = 189 million dollars
"WAAC calculation
Here WAAC is equal to cost of equity (ke) as company is debt free.
so
Ke = risk free rate + beta (risk premium)
= 5 + 2.5 (6) = 20%
b What is the value using the comparable recent transactions method?
Based on recent tansaction the value of siebel incorporated will be calculated as shown below
Value of SI = Profit afte * 10 = 25 * 10 = 250 million dollars
Publicly-traded Rand Technology, a direct competitor of Siebel's sale is taken as bench mark.
c What would be the value of the firm if we combine the results of both methods?
By combining value of both value technique we get 189 + 250 = 439 million dollars.
Answer:
Option C is correct
Explanation:
This means an increase in actual price would make quantity aggregate supply curve to shift to the right.
Answer:
$88,150
Explanation:
DINK method for insurance sums one half of all the debt plus funeral expenses. Thus,
Using DINK method
One half of mortgage, 140,000 = 70000
One half of car loan, 14000 = 7000
One half of personal debts, 4800 = 2400
One half of credit card loans, 3500 = 1750
Funeral expenses = 7000
Thus
Total insurance needed =
70000 + 7000 +2400 + 1750 + 7000
= $88,150
Note that, when using DINK method, what the spouse earn isn't used in calculating total insurance.
