1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
denis23 [38]
4 years ago
12

Evaluate the extent to which Jacksonians should be considered the guardians of the US Constitution, political democracy, persona

l liberties and equal economic opportunity.
History
1 answer:
guajiro [1.7K]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Jackson's Democrats believed that any American was capable of holding public office. Jackson also said that if a man were to hold office for an extended period of time, he would be able to "tolerate behaviors against which an inexperienced man would rebel." Along with the rotation, Jackson's Democrats reinstated the loot system. Jackson fired any previous incumbent who was not a loyal Democrat. Then he would name a Democrat for that position. The loot system and rotation were advances towards greater political democracy, because they showed that one man is as good as the other. In addition to creating a more democratic country, Jackson also sought to establish equal economic opportunity for the people of America. The best example of this is the veto of the statutes of the Bank of the United States. The bank was a great monopoly. It was led by aristocrats, most of whom were from England. Nicholas Biddle, who was the bank's president, often used bank funds to lend money to members of Congress, thus winning their support. In his veto message, Jackson wrote: "It is unfortunate that the rich and powerful often bend government actions to their selfish purposes." This was true, since the bank was used to satisfy the interests of the rich and not of ordinary men, such as small farmers and urban workers.

Explanation:

Jackson's Democrats saw themselves as the guardians of the United States Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty, and equal economic opportunity.

You might be interested in
How did the British colonies change between the early 1600s to the late 1700s?
drek231 [11]

Explanation:

By the mid-1700s, Great Britain had developed into a commercial and military powerhouse; meanwhile, the population rose dramatically in Britain's North American colonies. ... These new colonies also contributed to the rise in population in English America as many thousands of Europeans made their way to the colonies.

8 0
3 years ago
Many of the people who have come to mexico city have ended up living in areas
pochemuha
Many of the people who have come to Mexico City have ended up living in "surrounding" areas, since life in the city itself is very fast paced and dense, meaning that many people wish to enjoy the benefits of the city without being there directly. 
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What would happen if the president died and there were no vice president?
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

The order of succession specifies that the office passes to the vice president; if the vice presidency is simultaneously vacant, or if the vice president is also incapacitated, the powers and duties of the presidency pass to the speaker of the House of Representatives, president pro tempore of the Senate,

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what is the most important reason for the end of the (western) roman empire? and what is the least important reason for the end
dsp73
The most important reason for the collapse of Rome was the failure to actually integrate what they conquered. When Roman soldiers conquered new lands, it was rare that they ever attempted to force their culture, ideals, or laws upon the natives and barbarians. Thus, when the Empire began suffering internal struggles, the natives they had conquered decided to take action, which lead to the swift collapse by barbarian invasion from all sides. It's hard to pick a LEAST important reason, seeing that there were many of them, but I suppose a contender would most likely be the common refusal of the Empire to even acknowledge that barbarians were rising. On the outer edges of their territory, in places like Gaul and Morocco, the Roman government was reluctant to even recognize the threat of the barbarians, thinking that even accepting that these barbarians were causing trouble would weaken their prestige in the public eye.
4 0
3 years ago
In which war did the largest amount of Americans serve in the armed forces?
Verizon [17]
The correct answer would be World War II. The largest amount of Americans who served in the armed forces is during the World War II. During the world war II, <span>a large standing army become officially established. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Both Hinduism and Buddhism are native to what modern-day country?
    13·2 answers
  • Make a claim : what was president Andrew Jackson and the US government’s primary injustice against the Native/indigenous people?
    10·1 answer
  • The printing press was invented by:
    15·2 answers
  • Which statement BEST describes this excerpt from the Wilfred Owen poem?
    11·2 answers
  • After the Civil war states adopted black codes to?
    11·2 answers
  • With which of the following nations would it be easiest to exchange currency?
    11·1 answer
  • The president can be removed by Congress which is known as?<br> Idk help me plz
    6·2 answers
  • HHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELPP
    15·2 answers
  • Whats the answer 100 points please have source to back it up:)
    9·2 answers
  • Suppose that an increase in
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!