Answer:
Answer of Question 1:
D. It acts as the falling action of the story by showing what happens to the person who wins the lottery.
Answer of Question 2:
C. Tessie’s obviously negative view of the lottery after she wins she conflicts with the readers’ previous view of the lottery as rather mundane to create suspense about why Tessie gets so upset.
Explanation:
Answer 1:
In “The Lottery” (1949) by Shirley Jackson, when Tessie Hutchinson comes in the center of a cleared space, the conflict is about to resolve. So it is falling action of the story.
Falling Action is defined as the part of a story right after the climax and before the very end. It resolves all the conflicts of the story and wraps up the narrative.
Falling action should not be confused with resolution or denouement of a story which is the end of the story. During falling action the conflict is being resolved, while at resolution the conflict has been resolved.
Answer 2:
The title of the story, the mention of square between bank and post office, the excitement among children, women and men of the village – all make readers view lottery as a sort of cash prize. The reader first has a slight conflict by reading about stones in the start of the story. But he/she (the reader) ignores it to give it any importance. The real conflict arises when Tessie protests at the result of the lottery when she wins it (or in fact loses it).
The answer would be a Fused sentence because A fused sentence (or run-on) occurs when two independent clauses are joined without punctuation or without a coordinating conjunction. Which we can clearly see in the sentence
Answer: Fossals
Explanation:
Because show that after life
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Well if you think about it photosynthesis shows how the plants evolves so if you were to use a diagram that would support the fact that leaves take in nutrients and energy.
Hope this help you out. :3
Answer: He conveys that many different arguments can be presented against socialism.
Explanation: The rest don’t make sense, there is no process nor is it in order of importance. The next option says each point is a logical result of the previous one but each of the arguments don’t seem to connect to the previous.
